The legal age of consent should include anyone who has reached puberty and the law would not consider them minors, nor seperate from fully grown adults.
They are merely young adults and should not be considered children as this is an inherent lie that can be disproven through genetics.
The government must contain representatives of this view point.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-08 23:41
I think reaching puberty and completing puberty are two very different things.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-09 3:14
Men should marry little girl children: they are very cute. Afghans marry 8 yr old girls: and are very happy with their cute little wives. They tried to get white american men to; offering very very cute little girls to them as brides.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-10 0:35
Hindu law book: Manu Smirti 9.94 says that men should marry children
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:
A man thirty years old shall marry a charming maiden twelve years old; or one twenty four years old, a damsel eight years old; in the event of his duties suffering, he may do it sooner.—(94)
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-10 0:36
The Red Barron ID:uXgfQ1QB Thu 03 Feb 2022 09:43:52 No.359464422 Report Quoted By: >>359464953 >porn is bad for kids
lmao this is the dumbest shit I have ever heard, it is not true in any way and completely lacks all scientific value
I'm a zealot and you know what the Bible says about jerking off? Take a shower and wash your clothes after.
Also says to MARRY children exclusively, lmao of course roasties think sex is bad for kids
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-10 0:39
The Mahabharata encourages Hindu men to marry prepubescent children AKA “Nagnika”
**Mahabharata, book 13, chapter 44, verse 14** (13.44.14) A person of thirty years of age should wed a girl of ten years of age called a Nagnikā. Or a person of one and twenty years of age should wed a girl of seven years of age.
*Commentary on the word Nagnikā:* One who wears a single piece of cloth. *A girl in whom the signs of puberty have NOT appeared* does not require more than a singe piece of cloth to cover her. The mention of Nagnikā is due to an interdiction about wedding a girl of ten years in whom signs of puberty have not appeared
Sanskrit definitions of Nagnikā: A girl before menstruation(prepubescent); नग्निका नागतार्तवा (nagnikā nāgatārtavā) Ak.
Nagnikā (नग्निका).—f. (-kā) 1. A girl before menstruation or about ten years old.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-10 0:41
Yama Samhita verse 22 “The father, who does give away [in marriage] his maiden-daughter after she has attained the twelfth year, drinks her menstrual blood, month after month.” Tr. Manmatha Nath Dutt
Lol, that's one way to put it
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-10 16:01
>>4 Now, 8 years old is not even reached puberty, much less completed it.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-11 4:01
>>8 So what. That's just something you whites believe in. Men have married little girls when men were free people. YHWH allows marrying pre-pubecent little girls. You whites do not. Simple as.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-12 22:20
>>9 Prebubescent girl having sex might get injured.
Name:
Anonymous2022-02-13 14:57
>>10 So what. Women having kids might get injured. You whites believe women are the master: not the man. That the woman owns herself and the man is there to provide.
Which is why you deserve to die. And you are being killed by vax-genocide. Anyone might "get injured" doing anything too hard. Little afghan girls have been marrying as children for all of time: they are fine.