>>2He proposes smart things
"We already spend time checking a person’s employment history, criminal background, academics, credit history, etc., why would we not examine other aspects of a candidate more closely?
Ask questions and include things such as:
Have they made obvious contributions to the advancement of the profession?
Are they published in their field? Publications, blogging and other meaningful content to the profession can tell you a lot about the attitude, proficiency level and other important attributes; or not, the person possesses.
What tangible professional leadership roles have they been successful at and why? Are there any negative indicators?
Have they been consistent in their career progression and focus? People with natural aptitudes generally already recognize it and they are actively pursuing it. The caveat is still going to be the obvious professional contributions and intellectual facets still.
Are they making any attempts to mentor or otherwise share their professional wisdom and experiences? Many professionals do this through outreach activities, trade organizations, consulting and other public facing activities."