>>41You seem to think that I am not understanding you and that if explain it again, I would have to agree. The meaning of words is to communicate, thus language is the very definition of a social construct. The most popular conceptualization is what a word refers too, not the narrow and convenient meaning you have choosen here. Anyway, I disagree with what your claim that the conspiratorial interpretation is not the most popular, and that it is limited to society being designed for men. It is blamed for things as diverse as women not agreeing with some academic feminists' platforms (ironically, accusations of "internalized misogyny" being a more gendered centric phrase standing in for "false consciousness", dismissing that any but a hard core elite could possibly have a valid view being just as heirarchical and domineering as the "Patriarchy" itself) to women fighting amongst themselves to heteronormativity. That's no even including the batshit crazy shit I've read in feminist education theory where the rigidity of numbers are accused of being patriarchal. The scope of issues covered by the concept is extremely broad. Hence why I sat it is just the feminist version of internet nazis blaming all their inadequacies on the Jews.
You're remarkably lucid today, Kruger. It has been a long time since you've spammed like this -- not since world4ch I think, actually. Why did you come back?