Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Error: post less often

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-30 4:50

What the fuck is this shit?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-30 5:01

It means you should post less often.

Face it, your post is not so interesting that you should be able to post it twice just by hitting Reply twice really fast.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-30 5:09

>>2
KIKE!

Name: RedCream 2015-01-30 6:04

But posting moar often cannot possibly be an erroar.

The erroar repoart is itself issued in erroar.

I sense a meta-erroar. The system must admit its roal.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-30 7:26

Anti-spam measure.
If you're making multiple posts per minute, they're probably not very high quality. And it prevents flood bots. The other alternative would be to remove the timer and instead use a captcha, but neither solution is perfect.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-30 8:01

>>5
You are forgetting the third solution. No captcha. No timer. And let the flood spam come and go like the passing of the winds. But it's not my server. Not my problem. And not my business.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-30 15:52

>>6
You are forgetting the forth solution. Don't allowing posting.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-31 1:01

>>7
You are forgetting the final solution. Kill all posters.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-31 2:34

>>8
You are forgetting the initial solution. Don't create the universe.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-31 3:05

>>9
You are forgetting the atheist solution. Don't believe in a creator.

Name: RedCream 2015-01-31 4:52

>>10
You are foargetting the reality solution. Do not create a believer.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-31 4:55

>>10
Too many simpletons on here. Shouldn't you be on youtube making comments or just discovering steam in 2015.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-31 5:40

>>12
lol, discovering steam in 2015, the year of our macbook pro. egin!

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-31 9:54

>>12
Discovering and using proprietary software chock full of DRM and spyware is something people brag about these days?

Name: RedCream 2015-02-01 4:02

Why did everyone avoid commending me foar my unchecked dubs (>>11) which would have then become checked dubs? I am a bit hurt oaver this. Roals need to be admitted. Get to work on that, folks.

Name: Dubs Checking Agency 2015-02-01 5:08

Oh shit! How did we miss those!

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-01 7:55

>>16
Guess that's a good reason to take away more political freedoms and privacy from the citizens.

Name: RedCream 2015-02-01 17:03

How did this suddenly become a poalitical issue? I merely complained that my dubs remained in an unchecked moad. I did not foar a second even contemplate that there was a government agency assigned as a regulatoar foar such situations. Which act of the Congress established that? Congress needs to admit its roal.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List