Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 19:09
I don't have time to make both anymore, so which do you guys prefer?
Men go to war to protect their family against other men.And nothing to gain. Ergo, no wars.
If you got rid of women and children, you would have a mass of men with nothing to lose.
I think a group of men alone will be more violent than a group of men with womenMy experience has always been the exact opposite. The presence of women brings out a competitive and violent side in men, and will disrupt camaraderie and understanding every time. And most men instinctively know that "fighting for his woman" will get him laid by that woman, while backing down from a fight will make her resent him. Sexuality brings out the animal nature - the animal nature is purely brutal and violent.
don't have timeYou don't have several minutes to spare to make a couple of extra threads and cover both topics? We're not asking for Proust novels here, Palahniuk will do.
What was the brand of the shoe he threw at bush? If it was made in China, the U.S. would again say China provided terrorists with weapons.That was VIP Quality!