How Child Porn is not Free Speech?

Hitler has killed 6,000,000 Jews, yet Mein Kampf is free speech.

Pedos have killed no one, yet child porn is censured.

Where is logic?

Video games including sex have rating of 21 years, yet video game depicting war, torture and extreme violence (i.e. mortal kombat) pass under 18.

Games like GTA increase felony rates by trivializing crime. but they ain't censured, compared to innocent sex games.

why making love is not okay, while crime and violent murder propaganda is okay?

AFAIK, this censorship of sexual content owes its live to the feminist lobby.

Banning shotacon child porn was just a by-product.

Dragon Quest VI

"Free speech" refers to the right to speak against those in power - i.e. those with the power to silence speech - and was hard-won by the people. Associating it with pedos, racists and other social debris just makes it more likely people will willingly give up their right to it.

>>5
"Free speech" is the unrestricted right to speak anything you like. Even if it hurts some feelings, insults Prophet Muhammad, leads to million deaths or a nuclear war.

>>5

social debris

how come children became social debris?

http://www.redstate.com/diary/Finrod/2010/01/16/child-pornography-vs-freedom-of-speech-theres-got-to-be-a-middle-ground-here-somewhere/

A federal court in Philadelphia may make it legal for teens to send naked pictures of each other using cellphones.
The Wyoming County district attorney allegedly said he would charge the three high school girls with child pornography if they didn’t agree to be placed on probation, participate in a five-week re-education program and be subject to random drug testing.

>>7
lol

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/07/07/outrage-as-judge-tells-the-truth-about-child-pornography/
We’re well aware that the availability of pornography is at an all time high these days. What might be less obvious is that the level of sexual crime is falling, falling like a stone actually, and has been for well over a decade. Economists posit that there’s a link between these two things: that the technology of the internet has made the porn more available and this has led to a reduction in the level of meatspace sexual violence.

>>1,7
Learn English before posted you retarded nig.

>>10
Stop insulting Sir RedCream.

SEXCRIME or SEXCREAM? You must decide yoar roal.

PhaleCheese should change his name to RoadCone or RapeCrime in the interests of novelty.

FREE SPEECH: "the government is covering up bad workmanship that resulted in the deaths of many children"
NOT FREE SPEECH: "hurr i want to perform a degenerate act of masturbation while looking at sexually abusing children"

it's pretty simple.

pedos do not care about free speech. they only see it as a tool and will corrupt and destroy it by exploiting it for their own perverse benefit.

>>14
FREE SPEECH: anything expressible with 1 and 0
NOT FREE SPEECH: anything not expressible with 1 and 0

it's pretty simple.

pedos do care about free speech. they see it as a tool and will advance and extend it by exploiting it for their own perverse benefit.

>>15
Could you be any more jewish-influenced, you simpering fag?

>>16
i don't give a fuck about your jew conspiracy theory, point out a flaw or something false in my post rather than just trying to dismiss it by associating it with $bogeyman, you fucking jew.

>>15

FREE SPEECH: anything expressible with 1 and 0
NOT FREE SPEECH: anything not expressible with 1 and 0

lmao that is a 14 year olds way of thinking

real life is not reduced to bits

>>17
Get a load of Captain BluePill over here.

>>1
Pedos HAVE killed people; apart from cases where its only incidental that a pedophile is also a murderer, pedos have been known to kill their victims and any other witnesses to avoid getting caught. Additionally, production of child porn is not possible without causing child abuse, while continued production of mein Kampf does not harm anyone.

>>19
Not an argument

>>21
Not dubs

>>20

Pedos HAVE killed people

How can you kill anyone through internet protocol? Ping them to death?

production of child porn is not possible without causing child abuse

Making World War II video footage is impossible without killing millions, yet disseminating it doesn't kill anyone.

continued production of mein Kampf does not harm anyone.

Yet the events led to the creation of Mein Kampf killed millions. You must learn to discern physical action from informations about such action.

Also, ban violent video games, because were proven to increase crime. People playing GTA4 are known to commit murders.

>>23
Citation Needed!

>>20
Shalom, Andrea Goldstein, known feminist and Jewess! How goes the progress on that manifesto on how all sex is rape and that men must have their sexuality control to prevent objectification of women?

>>20
For 99% of human history there has been no concept of "pedophilia" being a bad thing. Nor was it referred to with a separate term from normal sexual relations of man and woman. Only homosexual pedophilia (pederasty) was referred to with a different name, but only because it's male-on-male.

Prohibition of pedophilia only started parallel to the rise of the Jewish-controlled feminist movement. Isn't that a funny coincidence?

>>26
That's because for most of human history people were idiots. If you raped some man's daughter he'd go to the court and they'd force you to marry her.

>>27
Yes goy, it's 2016 after all, everyone in the past was an idiot.

>>28
Exactly. I'm glad you understand.

>>27
This is because children were the property of their fathers. Not just women, but men were married off at the will of the head of the household (usually a man). This was done to ensure that the head of the household controls how and with whom the lineage continues. Naturally, no man would have his son marry a woman who slept around with other men, or who was unfaithful and divorced before. So, in essence, a rapist damages your family's chance of growing. So a rapist has three options - reimburse the head of the household with money or property, face criminal justice (which in those days usually meant execution), or marry the woman and provide for her, for she would not be wanted by another man because she is already sullied.

>>30
Yep, like I said, idiots.

>>31
I don't know, it seems like a much better order of things than what we have today. When you let women choose anything, be it our leaders or who to marry, they always take the inferior choice. In politics, they vote for things that make the nation weaker and in their personal lives, they make choices that weaken them and their families. Women are almost animalistic in the way they make their choices―automatically and without thought, based purely on their primal urges such as emotions.

● They run off with the deadbeat gangster because he can fake a personality which appeals to women's sexual selection mechanism.
● They vote for Obama or Clinton because "it's 2016."
● They don't know the difference between debt and equity spending.
● They overwhelmingly vote to open the borders because borders are "racist", then complain when they're raped by refugees all while failing to connect the two.
● They vote for speech restrictions because feelings to them are more important than fundamental human rights.

Overall I don't know why women even have equal rights to men when that's been a terrible thing for society since day one.

>>32

nation

Nationalism is an obsolete social construct, supported mostly by useless people without individuality. These evil luddites think that if they unit into nation and invent something like a white race, that will allow them to oppress good individualistic people, like say LGBTQ.

>>32
here is a nice NY Times article:
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/06/16/how-fluid-is-racial-identity/race-and-racial-identity-are-social-constructs

time to get educated!

>>33-34
You're a funny guy. ヽ(´ヮ｀)ノ

>>35
There is a simple way to eliminate racism and a lot of other ills including patriarchy. Why not make having a baby the natural way illegal? To have a baby women donate an egg to the government egg bank. Have the government randomize fertilization and if a woman wants a baby she gets a "government egg" implanted. It might be chinese, korean or black. In nine months there would be no more racism. Right now less than half of the children in school in the US are white. In a decade everyone would be essentially mixed. Then racism would have to vanish. There would be no white skins and no very dark ones either. Everyone's skin would be the same. Why do we need races? Does race help anything? It just causes pain and trouble. Let us get rid of them.

In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Right now less than half of the children in school in the US are white.

Pretty sure that isn't true, unless you're excluding those with mixed heritage several generations back but predominantly white.

Americans aren't white. Whiteness is a state of mind, and can only be found on Europe.

>>30

That was because... (some explaination basically saying "men should not today be allowed female children).

Ok you mother fucker. It seems you have not studied ancient cultures in the middle east.

This is the history, going backwards:
Hebrews - Singular Worship male God. Rape of female child = man keeps her, pays father some money. Man can execute adulterous women. Man owns the woman (he is ba'al (master, owner) of the woman).

Assyrians - Pantheon, but male god has taken the throne and killed the goddess