>>36Misredirecting the need for proof? You provided a source that doesn't support your hypothesis at all. If anything, you're the one backing your "intelligence is inheritable" hypothesis with "intelligence has been proven to be measurable". What does the latter have to do with the first?
The inheritability of intelligence is a highly controversial topic. Are you seriously basing your half-assed eugenics plan on some bullshit you read on Stormfront or Reddit?
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v388/n6641/full/388468a0.htmlCovariance between relatives may be due not only to genes, but also to shared environments
which means children of smart parents can be lazy niggers and your Reddit plan is not guaranteed to work.
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/3/525.longHeritability refers to the genetic contribution to variance within a population and in a specific environment (it was originally introduced for use in breeding experiments intended to improve crop yield); if the environment changes, the heritability measure changes.
which means being born to smart (but struggling) parents might affect your ability to develop your potential, because you might be too busy running away from niggers and surviving that you don't have any chance to "become" smart.
Ever heard of nature vs nurture? You're a massive retard if you think nature is 100% responsible for this. Killing all dumb people is never going to solve anything, fuck off back to Reddit with your childish world domination fantasies.