Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

SPACE TRAVEL VS. GENOCIDE

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-26 12:50

There's no real profit from spaceflight, even the satellites. There's no market in space. There are no Humans in space to sell to. And the energy and time it takes to get resources in space, forbid taking them for any reason. There won't be any asteroid harvesting... metals so obtained will cost orders of magnitude over what's obtained on Earth. There's just no point, economically speaking... and ECONOMICS is why Humans do anything.

We live in the Sad Age of the Nerd. Too many basement-dwelling masturbators are using the Internet to talk talk talk as of that will make impossible economics somehow *possible*. There must be some chemical in Cheetos{tm} that so often stains their fingers and affects their minds. The space future imagined by the virgin-nerds is economically impossible to achieve. Anything in a shortage on Earth that can be obtained in space, will only prompt the elite to induce privation and war, which will genocide enough of our population to reduce the so-called "need" for such resources. In other words, genocide is orders of magnitude cheaper to implement than space colonization. The elite who run Humanity have ALWAYS chosen genocide in times of stress. That's what economics dictates, and it's what our stupid top-down species prefers.

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-26 17:09

/space/

Name: RedCream 2015-11-26 18:04

Once again, this textual expression seems extremely familiar to myself. I sense a roal. I alsoa sense plagiarism. Do not be an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 4:10

And the energy and time it takes to get resources in space, forbid taking them for any reason.

solar panels /->/ solar panel manufacturing equipment.. [energy -> sustained or increased]
mining equip /->/ mining equip manufacturing equip [mineral ]

There won't be any asteroid harvesting...
a lot can happen in a hundred years or so, but yeah, things with stable nearby orbits and low gravity (so moons mostly) are probably a lot higher on the list

low-gravity mining & equip might actually be cheaper & more efficient than ordinary earth-mining?

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 4:20

I mean, if everything is 1/4 it's ordinary weight, the whole machine might be able to be built out of 1/2 thickness metal plate, further lowering strength requirements..

bigger machines with smaller engines?

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 5:08

>>3
Don't be selfish. Refusing to impart the RedCream wisdom on progrider is unfair.

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 5:41

inter-lunar travel seems it would be the cheapest form of space travel, just look at the difference between the earth - moon rocket vs the moon-earth lander return vehicle.
moon-moon vehicles should be relatively easy

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 6:37

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 7:33

Why is redcream a fascist jew like microsoft, adobe and all those entertainment companies? Why does he want to stop the free exchange of wisdom by trying to shut things down under the guise of """plagiarism"""? Does he think we don't deserve to know?

Name: Anonymous 2015-11-27 9:25

earth-moon's escape acceleration is a mild +3.6km/h /sec

possibly low enough for a human-powered liftoff even

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List