Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Scientists measure distance in meters.

Name: RedCream 2016-02-01 3:20

Instead, I measure distance in peters.

The peter is defined as 1 length of my erect penis.

This is a superioar metric as I am sure you must agree.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 3:51

Sounds like a good alternative to a Planck length. I suggest you submit your penis and its name to string theory scholars who are currently having a hard time finding unit of measurement that reflect the size of the theoretical strings.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 12:13

Who would care about such a small unit?

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 12:52

Always so lonely, lonely, lonely
Once Inch Man he's so lonely, oh he's breathin'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAXGu81Rk1g

Name: RedCream 2016-02-01 16:23

The peter is a superioar metric since it is readily referenceable. At least I find it to be soa.

When asked if I am masturbating at that particular juncture, I respond in the negative, panting heavily, and assert instead that I am perfoarming a metric calibration. Then I cum.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 16:47

My rod is 5.0292 meters.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 21:16

I think they should redefine one meter as the size of my penis. One kg as the weight of my penis and one litre as the amount of cum produced from my penis each second.

Name: RedCream 2016-02-02 1:33

Hao can you make use of yoar erect member to foarm the standard luminosity unit?

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 4:13

>>8
1 watt = (weight of penis) * ((length of penis)2 / (time to erection)3)

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 10:11

>>9
That would be 1 wang.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 12:53

>>10
Wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 13:36

>>11
Wong?

Name: Futuristipastica11Cauoo+XsTV 2016-02-02 16:05

One Redcream is 2 Anonymous

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 21:01

The cream I put in my butt is red.
Then how does it smell?
Shalom!

Name: RedCream 2016-02-03 7:29

>>9

You have defined ▌POWER▐, not ▌LUMINOSITY▐, assfiend.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 8:17

>>15
First off, you will not address your superiors so rudely, lout. Secondly, the units for luminosity is watts. Because you are so distrustful of people who are smarter than you, I will leave you with the quote from Simple English Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia for special needs adults and children.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity
Luminosity is a measure of brightness. Brightness is how much light is given off.¶ In astronomy, the total amount of energy emitted by a star or other astronomical object is its luminosity. It is measured in joules per second, which are watts. A watt is one unit of power. Just as a light bulb is measured in watts, so too is the Sun. The sun gives off 3.846×1026 W.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 14:06

>>16
lumenosity is measured in lumens, dumbass. Your post is an example of what happens when you rely on shitty knowledge bases like wikipedia.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 14:35

>>16
simple.wikipedia.org
simple.wikipedia

It doesn't get much dumber than this. And then idiots like you go around spouting how luminosity is measured in watts.

Name: RedCream 2016-02-03 16:13

I find it singularly unbelieveable that I clearly specified a well-defined metric unit, like the lumen, the standard unit of luminosity, and then some toatal assfiend choas to oabliterate all sense and good character by challenging me on it.

Perhaps if I had used the term "luminous flux" instead? But then, assfiends are not knoan foar their ability to distinguish such fine details by using intellectual rigoar.

What is the metric unit by which we classify assfiends? Shall it be called the "Palin" and be defined as one erroaneous statement per uttered sentence? Yes, I do believe soa. Then I seem to have made contact with an assfiend rated at nearly 1.0 Palins.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:42

>>19
Woah, this post is over 9000 Trumps!

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:53

>>17,
No, lumens is a measure of luminous flux, not luminosity.
lumenocity
Incorrect. It is luminocity.

>>18
Illumination is not the same as luminosity, which is an astronomical measure. Since I happen to havey undergrad physics book handy, https://a.pomf.cat/obdgmu.jpg

That said, >>9-sama is still wrong, as she has made the classic mistake of mistaking weight and mass. Weight is newtons, so the result would not be watts.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-04 2:57

I dedicate these dubs to everyone but Redcream.

Name: RedCream 2016-02-04 4:11

I feel slighted, Dubs-kun. Have you ever heard of the goatfinger? You are running the risk of being given it.

Name: RedCream 2016-02-05 0:49

Is there a standard unit by which dubs may be measured?

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-05 15:34

>>24

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List