THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIBERTARIANS AND COMMIES

Is there any difference between communists and libertarians? Let's compare:

Both are used by Jews to disrupt social cohesion and consolidate the resources/power of a country into the hands of a rootless few.

Both are obviously doomed to failure due to human nature, but a commie or libertarian will ignore facts and claim that their idealized fantasy would definitely work well.

Both hold nothing but disgust for national identity and feel it should be done away with in favor of a globalist one-world state.

Both love the idea of internationalist jews plundering their countries with impunity as long as they get to blather on about kike-theory and feel like elite geniuses.

I think it is clear there is literally no difference.

Yeah, but capitalism is better than communism.

Actually, in America it seems most libertarians are nationalist. Globalist libertarians, if they exist, seem like they would be regarded as part of the left-anarchist movement.

>>2
Only in theory

>>3
Most of the ones that claim to be libertarian are idiot "libertarian moralists" like Larry Sanger, who think that the scope of the government should match exactly what they, and only they, want. They are mostly poorly informed losers. The ones in the Libertarian party are globalist kikes.

Commies support strong government monopoly, that will enforce "communism" onto whole world, including 100% income tax.

Libertarians support weak government, low taxes and no welfare.

Anarchists don't support any government at all.

In practice we have either cronyism or authoritarianism, where single dictator or several powerful families run the country to their liking.

>>6
Nazis are similar to commies, with main difference being that income tax is high but not 100%, and the welfare given to the hard working white people, instead of non-working blacks. Similarly, opposition to illegal immigration and job security could be seen as forms of welfare for white people (africans dont care about job security because they dont work anyway). All these UKIPs and "socialist parties" are actually thinly-veiled nazis, no different for NSDAP.

As a libertarian, I believe it is vital that we immediately slash the number of whites on welfare to ensure that more diverse demographics can flood through our open borders confident they can be taken care of while they adjust. While, in an ideal world, I would like no welfare at all, I understand that non-white welfare is important for encouraging egress through our open borders. We cannot dismantle both our borders and the welfare system at once, that is the cold hard truth.

>>8
Welfare was introduced for a reason, to buy loyalty of citizens. If you cancel welfare, then people just rebel, overthrow you and put a nice populist leader in your place. Even if that leader will put them into Gulag, then will still be thinking that their daily ration is free. Still Gulag should be great for america, because it will eliminate all these supersized amerifats.