The hyped "Obama Recovery"

Millions who "climbed out of poverty" with food stamp use is at all time high:
http://www.trivisonno.com/food-stamps-charts
The average household is paying a total of $6,658 in interest per year.
https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/credit-card-data/average-credit-card-debt-household/

While 'economy'(the corporations, wall street, banks) is in better shape(due stimulus spending and likely data manipulation http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-22/gdp-changes-coming-in-july-as-u-s-addresses-weak-first-quarters ), the people are not "recovering" and pretense they are still getting jobs is disproved by closer look at statistics.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/30/obamas-economy-in-9-charts/
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/fake-jobs-plague-us-economy
Its no wonder its called Great Recession now, the impact is still relevant. The median income is falling within context of rising costs and inflation continuing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Real_Household_Median_Income_thru_2014.png
http://www.inflationdata.com/inflation/inflation_rate/currentinflation.asp

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

median income $30,453

personal debt / citizen (avg) $54,825

The Democrats were the party of Andrew Jackson who was the slave owner who did abuse his slaves and they remade themselves to fool the black community that they were their champions. It was amazing that they remade themselves. Hillary still claims she represents the poor minorities, calls people “Jew Bastard” and takes money from Saudi Arabia who is against women’s rights and gays. She claims to be against Wall Street, but the majority of her money comes from bankers and hedge funds.

~~~

And people still don't understand why Trump has such huge support, more than any Republican candidate in history despite not being of the Republican establishment? It's for this very reason: Americans are fed up with the bullshit coming from the corrupt, same-old establishment circlejerk; they are fed up with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Cheney, all those fucking names who stand for nothing but corruption, lies and degradation. They want someone who will stand up for the people and if it's Trump, then that's who they'll vote for (considering that Bernie was a lie to create the impression of alternative). Doesn't matter what Trump says or which photoshoots his women had - Hillary is for sale, Trump isn't.

~~~

Donald Trump has taken nearly $ 100 million in just three months by small donations – more than any Republican before ever in history. That is actually more than two million donors than support his rival Hillary, whose money comes really from only large donors, such as banks and hedge funds. They OWN Hillary and she outspends Trump. If we look at this measurement, the PEOPLE are lining up behind Trump more than Hillary.

That's what this vote is: it's not about Hillary vs Trump or Democrat vs Republican; it's about the "elite" vs the common people.

Sick of corrupt politians pandering to greedy businessmen? Why not cut out the middleman and elect the crooked direct! Morons.

>>4
lol epic

Once a politician, always a politician. They are just incapable of telling the truth. The New York Post, who may become the American version of the British Guardian, has now exposed that Obama used a fake name to communicate with Hillary on her private server because he KNEW what she was doing. While tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails have been made public so far, the government has not released any emails from Obama.

Obama told CBS news that he had no idea that Hillary was using a private email server until it was reported by the New York Times on March 2, 2015. That is clearly an outright lie, and if he were in a private fraud case, he would be criminally charged with her for conspiracy. Hillary’s continuous crime included other parties who may join the plot later and incur joint liability. His use of fictitious names is PROOF that he knew what she was doing was a crime, for he tried to hide his identity as a co-conspirator. This raises the question of whether he will benefit from the Clinton Foundation in the future.

Of course, those in government are always exempt from the same laws they use to persecute the public. So there is no way the FBI would dare recommend indicting Obama, and the plot to ignore the law is beginning to be exposed a bit more. If they had indicted Hillary, then they would have to charge Obama as a co-conspirator. That is the way it would work in any other setting.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/2016-u-s-presidential-election/obama-conspired-with-hillary-used-a-fictitious-name-to-communicate-with-hillary-on-her-private-server/

>>6
This looks fake. By searching "obama fake name hillary server", I found several articles with similar titles, none from mainstream media sites and all from the past few days. In fact, the oldest appeared AFTER a similarly titled thread on the SubredditSimulator subreddit, which is populated entirely by Markov chain bots.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditSimulator/comments/54brrb/breaking_obama_used_a_secret_pseudonym_to_avoid/
(note that the article linked in the Subreddit Sim thread is actually about birth control in California).

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/23/fbi-docs-obama-used-pseudonym-to-email-hillarys-server/
This is one of the articles about Obama's alleged use of a pseudonym. It claims that evidence exists in the FBI FOIA documents, and does link to a specific document, as well as containing a picture of the excerpt in question. Unfortunately, the document is 189 pages long, and the viewer on the site does not include a search function (it may even be scanned rather than OCR'd, making a textual search useless) so I am unable to verify whether the excerpt actually exists in the document.

It is interesting to note that the FBI was mentioned in the SubredditSim post.

So either the SubredditSim post was disinfo to discredit the evidence of Obama's pseudonym, OR all the articles about Obama's pseudonym are made-up clickbait inspired by the SubredditSim post.

There's no doubt that if Hillary was some entry-level pleb and had done the same thing with the e-mails, she would have been criminally prosecuted by now.

>>7
With modern mainstream media, you don't know what's fake and what's real anymore.

>>9
Post your IQ with proof (NO FUCKING INTERNET TESTS) or just shut the hell up about big-picture stuff like that.

>>10
I've never cared to take an IQ test. However, the amount of lies in the media recently should be obvious to anyone unbiased. They ran Project Fear before Brexit vote, they call migrants "refugees" and "underage children" (when most of them are fighting age men who lie about their origins), and all the media support Hillary and bash Trump despite him being like the most popular Republican candidate ever. No one bashes Loretta Lynch who is obviously corrupt, or Hillary and her big bank donors like Goldman Sachs. One starts to wonder what other pieces of truth they suppress or under-report.

>>11

bash Trump despite him being like the most popular Republican candidate ever.

Trump isn't popular among either establishment democrats or establishment republicans, i.e. adults, i.e. people who run most of the media. He's really only popular among millennials. And Hillary is actually beating him in the polls...if Trump is the most popular Republican candidate ever, that would imply that no Republican candidate ever could beat Hillary in the polls. Which really makes the Republican party look pretty pathetic...I'm a Hillary supporter myself, and even I admit that at best, she's just the lesser of two evils.

>>9
You forgot your "wake up sheeple", oh enlightened one.

>>12

Trump isn't popular among either establishment democrats or establishment republicans

Because he wants to end the mass corruption and make the government serve the sheeple people.

And Hillary is actually beating him in the polls
that would imply that no Republican candidate ever could beat Hillary in the polls

These polls are shifting like the desert dunes, Trump was leading several times in the past. The only thing they show is that the two candidates are neck and neck and probably will be until the general election.

Donald Trump set the record for the most GOP primary votes ever

http://www.politifact.com/north-carolina/statements/2016/jul/08/donald-trump/donald-trump-set-record-most-gop-primary-votes-eve/

These polls are shifting like the desert dunes, Trump was leading several times in the past.

Only for very brief periods of time. Over 90% of the time in the last few months, Hillary has been in the lead.

>>15
Takano has to keep beating Rika until she gives up in order to win. Rika only has to beat Takano once in order to win. Though Rika is weaker, the game is biased in her favor.

>>12
Hillary is absolutely disgusting. I find it ironic that she pretends to care about the empanadas voting for her, yet she helped bring about a 2009 coup in Honduras that ended up killing a bunch of them. The worst thing Trump has done is call one a fatty 20 years ago and referred to some tacos that Mexico is sending us criminals and rapists (not an untrue thing, by the way). I guess outright killing people is "lesser of two evils" to you than calling people names and hurting precious fee-fees.

>>17
It's not 2009 anymore. Hillary hasn't done anything lately to hurt Hispanics, while Trump has been scapegoating them, so in that regard Hillary wins their vote. Besides, it's not just voting for a president, it's really voting for a party, and Democrats tend to support Hispanics and other minorities more than Democrats do. And while Trump had that whole "anti-establishment" act going, it's now obvious he has no chance of winning unless he panders to the Republican establishment.

>>18

It's not 2009 anymore

So?

Hillary hasn't done anything lately to hurt Hispanics,

So because it's the current year and no longer 2009, that makes it all ok. I hope you're not in charge of investigating unsolved crimes in your jurisdiction.

while Trump has been scapegoating them

Addressing the criminal elements in a population is not "scapegoating". He has absolutely no problem with Mexican and other Latin American people who have emigrated legally, followed through with the bureaucratic process and are law-abiding.
As for the rest of your post, by and large, the Democratic party as a whole (apart from some diehard small volunteer groups) tend to be worse and not better for minority groups, they just pander to them for votes and provide EBT cards. And I don't live in some out of the way suburb, I live in a reasonably-sized city in the New York metropolitan area that's in a left-leaning state and I see this first hand. It also gets worse the closer to New York City one travels.

>>19

So because it's the current year and no longer 2009, that makes it all ok.

Um, uh, you, er, you are aware that questions are supposed to end in question marks, right?

Guys, it's not current year anymore!

We have detected that you are using adblock on your web browser. Please disable adblock to view this content.

>>20
That wasn't a question, hence no question mark.

>>23
Uhhhhh.... a-are you sure about that? Because, um, because..... if so then please explain how it being the current year makes it all okay.

>>15
Brexit polls predicted "Remain" up until the vote. Stop believing that several thousand polled can predict the outcome of the vote of millions with the precision of several percentage points.

>>25
Hillary's been leading by much more than a full percent. Precision doesn't even come into it.

>>24

If so then please explain how it being the current year makes it all okay.

I don't know, you tell me. You're the one defending Hillary.

>>24
Please don't go over your daily quota of ellipsis.

>>26
I said "several percentage points". A percentage point is not larger or smaller than a percent, it is incommensurable with it. Are you sure you know what a percentage point is?
And yes, the spread in the Brexit poll was about the same as the spread between Donald and Hillary in the American polls.

This is still somewhat continuing under Trump, but improving. Debt just hit $20 trillion, but GDP growth is at 3% (good), food stamp recipients dropped ~3-4 million but still high hovering at 40 million. I'll cut him some slack since he's been in less than a year, though.

>>30

I'll cut him some slack

I'm sure he'll be very relieved to hear that!

>>30
lol

>>31
Yes, of course

>>32
El oh el