late feesYou mean like abortion expenses?
where everybody is a lawyer/kike trying to sneak money out of the next guy's pocketWelcome to capitalism. It's a system based on usury and basically founded on Jewish belief (not even being ironic here). It was never about "creating value", just about finding the next way to profit off of the manipulation of capital. "Creating an economic system" involves dismantling the capitalist system, which I don't see happening until after this system fails (when the oil market collapses, basically).
usury and the empty valueless manipulation of wealthWhat has that got to do with it? The problem is a cheating culture in the common man. Of course Jews will Jew, but their dour gloom has begun to influence the average person too much these days. One should aspire to create value through engaging in honest competition for market share, not to simply hide behind Jewish weaseling and collect fees.
What has that got to do with it?A whole lot, actually. People are, in major part, a product of the system under which they live. This sort of wealth manipulation is basically a logical extension of capitalism as a system, seeing as it is both the most profitable and the easiest (once you've got the means).
we must ensure our lives are principle-driven and competitiveThis is a noble goal, and I agree, but the sad fact is that, unless a system encourages this kind of behaviour, it will not be the popular choice. This ensures a spiritual/moral satisfaction, yes, but there will always be more profit in immoral behaviour under capitalism.
This sort of wealth manipulationDoesn't have a lot to do with people cheating each other as a matter of course. In fact, wealth manipulation in that sense requires a government to protect the manipulators at a certain point -- or rather, it requires they have access to violence and the ability to not be punished for using it. Because at some point the "wealth" they are manipulating has to be reflected in resources. And resources go to the violent, period. If the masses are not standing together, the government has a monopoly on violence.
there will always be more profit in immoral behaviour under capitalismWhy specify capitalism? Venezuela is far from a capitalist country, but their people starve while the country clubs horde all the food for fancy parties. You appear to have a bias of some sort, perhaps a thorn in your butt in regards to capitalism. However, a system, whether capitalism or other, is an abstract reflection of the common man's values. So if the common man is Jewish-influenced, the system will reflect that in practice. That is because economic/legal systems are open to interpretation and subject to the discretion of various (human) parties in the chain. So, a healthy and moral society will find a way to make its systems reflect human values in practice.
Doesn't have a lot to do with people cheating each other as a matter of courseAh, but it does. The manipulator cheats the worker out of the product of his labour, purely by virtue of having the money/power to do it. Whether or not this involves violence or protection is irrelevant, since any corporate force that amasses enough wealth to reach this level of power will be supported by a government concerned with wealth foremost. It's not a closed system; this protected status is open to any of the immoral elite who manage to make enough cash to assert their status, and these people will always be present in society at some level.
You poo-poo spiritual/moral satisfaction and question what value it has compared to a dollarYou misunderstand me here. It is not that I personally hold these things in low regard -- I very highly prize beauty of spirit and character, and think that our economic system should both reflect and reward these traits. However, I don't believe the majority cares much about these abstract virtues, especially taking into consideration the relative death of religion and spirituality in the West. You overestimate the average citizen: most people prefer their material pleasures and vices to any sort of spiritual gain, and this comes about from a lack of guidance, whether by religion, spirit, or state. A system that doesn't accommodate the unthinking folk fails in all but theory. Human nature must be accounted for in all its ugliness as well as its beauty, and it is the ignorance of this fact that is childish.
product of his labourThis is a manipulative term, which hasn't made sense in hundreds of years. Your labor is only producing value in combination with other laborers and the infrastructure developed by others. For example, I run an eCommerce business, and I pay a production lab to produce my products, which I then sell using Amazon, Shopify+authorize, and advertising platforms like Google. I have to pay all of these companies in the chain a cut of the earnings I generate through my hard work whether I make a profit or not. But without them I would not be able to maintain the infrastructure to process payments, produce the products, advertise to millions, own my own servers, or develop my own shopping cart solution from scratch.
I don't believe the majority cares much about these abstract virtuesThink about how modern consumer societies operate: people feel empty and confused so they buy buy buy to fill mysterious holes. That is a cliche because it is true. People hunger for something more virtuous and meaningful than what they see around them. But people instinctively follow the herd, so mass propaganda and exposure to Jews has made most people think they are alone in hungering for something less worthless. Consumer culture could not exist if people didn't have an abstract hunger being unfulfilled. And talk to immigrants from places like rural Ghana, they will say that people are happier there than they see in the West. Even though thy have warlords and Jews stealing all their wealth, what do they really care? Hording wealth is for the Jews, they just want to live and work in a functional community connected together in honor-based systems where honestly besting competition leads to reward. It's what humans need, and it took massive efforts to trick people into thinking they just needed a new car every year to finally feel okay.
But I am talking about how a small business can operate in a sustainable and fair fashionCapitalism always inevitably leads to small business dying out because large-scale capital has loads of advantages over small players. Bribing officials is just one of them, with some others being: having access to financial markets, getting cheaper loans from banks, being able to engage in price dumping to weed out competition, having more money to devote to R&D, having more money to enter new markets (and any other activities with high entry costs like buying up patents), being "too big to fail" (bailed out by government), having better lawyers etc. Capitalism always leads to consolidation of capital, cartelization and destruction of small businesses because having lots of money is a positive feedback system.
Former hedge fund manager Mr Shkreli was labelled a “morally bankrupt sociopath” and “the most hated man in America” after his company bought the rights to Daraprim last year and then raised the price in the US from $US13.50 a tablet to $US750.
So capitalism can be a tool that forces one to raise their standards to best their competitionCapitalism also has properties that work to hinder competition. Like when competitors watch the leader and always copycat it so no one can get ahead, so there's no reason to innovate at all because following the leader is cheaper. Chinese like to do that a lot which is why Chinese goods have a reputation of being fakes but often high quality fakes; what's the point of buing an authentic product made on American soil if you can buy Chinese look-alikes from dozens of producers which are pretty much as good and cost a fraction? So then the capitalists start thinking "what's the point of competition if you can't make money off of it no matter how hard you work", and start thinking of ways to reduce competition and be kings of the hill where there will be as few competitors as possible. This is why you have Apple with their incredibly restricted, closed OS that you can't freely install third-party software on. This is why you have a system of patents with people patenting the shit out of every trivial thing they can. This is why you have companies creating demand rather than serving it, like the pharmaceuticals did with that chicken flu or whatever. The truth is, capitalism is often a contest of wits and cheats rather than of honest workers trying to make the quality of their products better. This has nothing to do with Judaism or "money hoarding" (which isn't a bad thing anyway because you might need that money for when a loved one gets ill or when you get old), this is just a fact of life as human industries are diverse and not all of them encourage honest competition.
People hunger for something more virtuous and meaningful than what they see around them.No, they don't. People hunger to have their bread and their shows, that's all. This was known in times of Ancient Rome, and this is amply demonstrated by the modern consumerist First-World societies. Hell, if you really read up on the ancient literature like Beowulf and take note of every time the discourse is about food, you would be appalled how important being well-fed was to the ancient, supposedly more spiritual and virtue-oriented societies. Cattle was culled to greet ambassadors (the more important the ambassadors, the more cattle), to send the dead on their way (because OMG what are their spirits going to eat on the way to the spirit world?!?), wars were started over bad food, provinces paid taxes in food, feudal lords let their own armies ravage their own counties to get food etc. Lots of blood has been spilled over things like salt and spice. Not to mention the obligatory harvest rituals, sacrifices against drought and famine and so on. Thus, even in the more spiritual and moral times, when people cared more about honor and reputation than cars and smartphones, what most people really cared about was feeding themselves and their families. It's no wonder then that, once the hunger is satisfied, most humans find that they don't really care much about anything. This actually explains most of the modern valueless, virtueless, inane and immoral Western society. What it doesn't explain is that the idle mind and body (the Devil's playground, as they say) starts developing various unhealthy diseases that were unheard of in the ancient, hungry times when people had to streamline their lives to get by. There probably weren't many weak fatsters in a barbarian army - likewise there probably weren't many people with depression and loneliness and anorexia and similar bullshit. When you gotta really work to get food, you don't have time to get fat or depressed. This explains the
immigrants from places like rural Ghana, they will say that people are happier there than they see in the Westpart.
I'd say that what most humans want first and foremost is to be well-fed.Its obvious food is central(all organisms require food/energy), and denying that energy trigger survival instincts.
Capitalism always inevitably leads to small business dying outNo, that isn't true. Small business was all there was when the USA, other than the giant energy, etc. conglomerates who developed infrastructure for small businesses to use. Walmart, for example could not exist without government interference (essentially a form of socialism for the select few). The banks who stole trillions and made millions homeless last decade also would have gone to prison and had their assets seized in a capitalist society. Huge companies develop infrastructure at scale for small businesses to thrive, both a valuable and both have a place in a free society as long as free competition is what made them.
if your company is as good as you're saying, you probably will have it bought off your handsNo I won't. It is a small company that sells like 1000 units a month, and requires me to engage with customers. It cannot be scaled massively without becoming generic. So instead of buying me, some big company can just put on a generic. But my specialty product still has value to some. Because I market it in a human way that big companies cannot recreate. I might not make even a million dollars, but I have free time and save a little money so it's good enough for me. Much better than a job or dealing with some socialist party dolling out resources equally to those who tow the line.
When you gotta really work to get food, you don't have time to get fat or depressedWhen you are around people you trust and your small society is designed to allow everybody an opportunity you don't get depressed. When you feel you have a place and voice in your society. When it isn't a global village run by Jews where nobody can trust each other because there is no common culture you don't get depressed. People in rural villages don't actually tend to work that much compared to us goym. The ones who work the hardest get the mot reward in terms of resources like extra food, sex, adoration, trinkets. That is why they are not depressed.
