>>20,22I don't know what the solution is here, guys. YouTube is a household name and institution, and to get the cosmic shift you're seeking somebody extremely popular like
PewDiePie or the guys that run the
Dude Perfect channel would have to make at least one alternative site their second home. Doing so would make whatever site they moved to double in popularity overnight and probably completely crash the Web server. Its it likely to happen? No. The other thing would be for the government to step in and break it up, but that's also not likely to happen since I'm sure they benefit from having online monopolies to make it easier for signals intelligence gathering.
not to mention the fact that those some sites steer their users towards a nonfree license.
I've looked at pew.tube and d.tube, there doesn't seem to be
any kind of license for videos. In that case, you could just add a quick introduction at the beginning of every video what version of Creative Commons license it's under.
The exception to that would be BitChute,...() mostly because of their decentralized model.
d.tube also is decentralized. I think only pew.tube isn't (ignoring vid.me).