>>11He didn't follow up on prosecuting Hillary and officially called it off on inauguration day
There's no evidence he "called it off". Think of how entrenched and powerful they are, they could easily have failsfes that would cause huge damage if he moves too fast. You have to assume it is being worked on, unless you think he is 'le clinton plant' simply because of all the shit she pulled that damaged him. But why should he risks bringing down the country by rushing to go after her? That would be childish.
The Shayrat missile strike on April 7 "muh beautiful babies"
It caused zero meaningful damage and a couple of soldiers died. Since then he has organized a ceasefire and it has held for several months so far. This is such a forced criticism and so far from the reality that I question your motives.
Announcing recently that it's business as usual in Afghanistan
If he pulled out he risks losing influence in the area. It's a terrible quagmire and failure, but there is no easy solution considering how delicate the geopolitical arena is. Considering what other presidents have left him, if he doesn't start new conflicts and deescalates Iran/Syria we have to praise his international policy even if he stays mired in Afghanistan.
the departure of Steve Bannon
He always said he would leave after a year. He is back at Breitbart and taking down the 'cuckservative' wing of the GOP for 2018.
the influence of Jared and Ivanka
That's just an MSM smear with zero evidence behind it.