Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Imgur discloses data breach which affected 1.7 million user accounts

Name: Anonymous 2017-11-28 7:26

https://www.medianama.com/2017/11/223-imgur-data-breach/
Online image sharing community Imgur notified users of a potential data breach which occurred in 2014 which affected 1.7 million accounts. Imgur said that email addresses and passwords might have been compromised. The company said that it got an email on November 23 by a security researcher and said that he had data that included information of Imgur users.
“Our Chief Operating Officer received the email late night on November 23rd and immediately corresponded with the researcher to learn more about the potential breach. He simultaneously notified Imgur’s Founder/CEO and Vice President of Engineering. Our Vice President of Engineering then arranged to securely receive the data from the researcher and began working to validate that the data belonged to Imgur users,” Imgur said in the blog post.

This is why I use and donate to community-supported file/image hosts like mixtape.moe, catbox.moe, kek.gg, vgy.me, ect. and you should too.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-06 23:15

>>39
But I'm the OP, it was an acceptable sub discussion. The real dilemma is having a long-term file/image storage solution that doesn't have what happened to Imgur happen to it.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 3:48

>>41
Starting a thread gives you authority, how...?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 4:44

>>41
Actually, I'm the OP, and that sub-discussion was actually completely unacceptable and terribly shameful.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 6:20

>>42
It's probably best to stick to basic uploading and storage. Let people maintain their own off-site bookmark systems to manage it.

>>44
that sub-discussion was actually completely unacceptable and terribly shameful.
It went with the general theme of long-term posterity on the Internet. We have archived world4ch threads, there is also a need for reliable and stable hosts for images and other media.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 6:53

>>45
It went with the general theme of long-term posterity on the Internet.
No, that's the topic that spawned the discussion. What it devolved into was a pointless argument about rhetorical questions founded by someone with little to no reading comprehension.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 7:16

>>46
Oh. My. Fucking. God! Just no. Not every fucking question is "rhetorical" okay. Holy shit.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 7:52

>>47
Are you sure about that?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 9:49

>>48
What did I just say?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 9:57

I don't know. What did you just say?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 10:04

>>50
.......Are you being rhetorical right now?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 10:32

>>51
Am I? Perhaps I'm the Queen of England...

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 10:58

The queen of England wouldn't ask questions claiming they were rhetorical, that's a flaw found only in Mediterranean/Semitic peoples. Please.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 12:28

>>53
Are you sure about that?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 13:45

I'm Queen of England, yes I'm the real Queen
All you other Queens of England are just imitating
So won't the real Queen of England, please stand up,
Please stand up,
Please stand...ow, I think I broke my hip

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-07 23:46

Fuck Elizabeth II, she didn't object to her oil drilling shit of a grandson from being engaged to that twice divorced, half Jew, half dindu. The English/British Monarchy hasn't been legitimate since after Cromwell. I now support its abolition and the establishment of a British Republic.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-08 6:00

An Islamic Republic is more likely.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-08 6:09

At this rate, sadly yes.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-08 7:15

>>56
Sage when you're making an off-topic post, newfag.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-08 7:34

>>59
But I wanted to bump the thread.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-09 16:57

BOOMPSY

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-13 2:29

imgoat.com is also a good alternative.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-13 20:38

>>62
Are you serious?
It's not.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-15 6:30

>>64
Unlikely.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-19 16:54

>>63,65
Yes, it is. Although, I use mixtape.moe and catbox.moe more often.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-19 17:12

Why would anyone make an account on imager? Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-21 18:01

>>67
To better manage their uploaded content, I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-21 18:40

>>68
Why would anyone manage their uploaded content there? If it's a temporary vessel for file transfer, use something that will expire in hours. If you are looking for permanency, use proper hosting.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-22 2:10

>>69
Why would anyone manage their uploaded content there?
Because they're a bunch of dummy cats. It just shows that if Imgur can fuck up this bad with user accounts, then they can fuck up regarding other data as well.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-22 8:27

>>69,70
I suspect it's in part because Imgur, although lending themselves to typical imagehosting, also presents itself and is primarily a social media site and trying to make revenue as a social media site rather than a nonprofit project like most other image hosts.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:49

>>71
That's precisely why it's bad to use. It's trying to become some cancerous "social media" platform instead of just simple image hosting.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 13:42

Reminder why Imgur is no good.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 14:03

>>1
Can these sites handle even a fraction of imgur traffic?
imgur is on the same bandwidth league as Reddit itself.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 14:06

>>74
Can these sites handle even a fraction of imgur traffic?
Sure, if you paythem enUf. :)

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 15:32

>>74
Thy don't need to, because a site like that is niche. The very name is enough to keep the norms out.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-02 19:05

Reminder that Imgur is bad (>>62).

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-17 14:34

Imgur is still bad (>>62).

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List