On Wikipedia I was banned for a single edit, removing the false assessment of the "Islamic terrorist" in an article about the hero of the Chechen people - Amir Khattab. After my ban, a new lie was immediately added to the article, unsubstantially stating that Khattab is an "Arab mercenary", although Khattab, a Chechen whose ancestors fled from the Russians from Chechnya, fought for the idea and freedom of his people from Russians, first in Afghanistan , where the Russians unceremoniously invaded, then in Chechnya, to which the Russians attacked like a flock of plague ravens on the eagle. In Wikipedia I was banned, judging by the discussion, the obvious hurray-patriots whose personal pages are hung with George ribbons, orthodox icons and dies, like "Born in the USSR." There is an obvious conflict of interest. It's not for them to judge Khattab.
Amir Khattab did not engage in terrorism, he fought exclusively with the Russian invaders. But Russian meanly slandered the soldier of freedom. Terrorism is when some Charlie Hebdo is blown up for funny pictures, and not when you defend from the attack of a Russian soldier, armed to the teeth, who came to the lands of your ancestors. The so-called "Chechen terrorism" is just a provocation by the FSB, which was tasked with getting an excuse to seize Chechen land. So the Russians themselves blew up their homes (for example, the case of "Ryazan Sugar"), accusing the Chechens of this, just as Stalin rigged Kirov's murder, accusing his political opponents. In addition, I was threatened that Kadyrovtsy would now kill me. Ramzan Kadyrov, a Kremlin's puppet, spreads anti-Semitic nonsense about Khattab, stating that "Khattab is a Jew and his daughter is Sarah." Russia is made up of such frank cynical lies. Chechens people call Kadyrov "Kafirov" (from the word Kafir - the traitor), for the fact that the Kadyrov clan cooperated with the KGB even in the Soviet Union and sold chechen people to the Russians for the money and the patronage of the Kremlin.
>>6 European gentile ingenuity and genius made the USA into a superpower, in spite of destructive kikery like the Federal Reserve and their propaganda. Even support for Israel is waning and people here are questioning why Congress must incessantly suck Netanyahu's circumcised cock every time he comes for a visit. The Jews are on borrowed time, and they know it.
Wut? Even Hollywood, one of the most profitable US enterprises, was made by Jews. As for Europeans... they make movies like Nekromantik or Uwe Bolls productions, lol.
Jewish subhumans: Warcraft The Movie German Aryan ubermenschen: Alone in the Dark
>>16 That doesn't prove that it's controlled by a Russian. The site hosts politically incorrect content, so that reason alone the admin wants to remain anonymous. Being non-PC = going against J-left narrative. (>>3,11)
site hosts politically incorrect content, so that reason alone the admin wants to remain anonymous.
Admin can always state that he doesn't agree with the content, as it was uploaded by anonymous user, but he is pro free speech, so he won't remove it even if he disagrees. After all, US laws allows any speech, except child porn.
After all, US laws allows any speech, except child porn.
Correct, except we have here SJW retards that like to dox people they disagree with, not giving a shit about the First Amendment, trying to create a politically correct social situation that resembles Western Europe outside of USA law.
You can't SJW someone for being neutral. So the owner that resource is obviously not neutral, and he shares some radical opinion or gets paid by Russians.
The Supreme Court disagrees with you. See Miller v. California (1973) and New York v. Ferber (1982). We already discussed this previously here: https://dis.tinychan.org/read/lounge/1508930175
Name:
Anonymous2018-01-17 19:47
>>24 If you want to claim that the constitution is so great and wise, you need to address two facts: 1) the founding fathers were all occultist atheists who literally believed in the moronic "many worlds" theory that space was real and contained many so-called "Earths" and alien civilizations; 2) American people are debased and ignoble, concerned only with ridiculous Judaic concepts like "passing on genes" and "leaving a legacy". How can these two facts be reconciled with your assertion that the constitution isn't worthless and influenced by Satan himelf?
>>25 Miller v. California (1973) and New York v. Ferber (1982) is not part of the constitution. It is a courtcase that ended with an unconstitutional result.
It is a courtcase that ended with an unconstitutional result.
Then you would have to argue why they came to an unconstitutional result. If the Supreme Court takes your case and decides in your favor, then those cases are overturned and CP is then legal and protected by the First Amendment.
Name:
Anonymous2018-01-18 1:29
They redirected me to Russians, who boorishly refused to answer in English, stating in Russian that:
>Статьи в Википедии пишутся ... на основе информации из авторитетных источников, не зависимо, положительная или отрицательная информация о герое
I.e. Russians imply that Kremlin's propaganda outlet, like RussiaToday, is an authoritative source on a person, who fought against Kremlin, and anyone questioning it must be banned.
Please, help disseminating news about this injustice!
Name:
Anonymous2018-01-18 2:36
Say that you do not speak russian and that you speak english instead. Also bring the issue to the public mailing list of the english wikipedia. Also ask them why they ban anyone who simply removes part of an article without committing vandalism. Also call >>29 a faggot.
Name:
Anonymous2018-01-18 2:36
Also, why do you hate me Nikita? What did I even do to you?
Say that you do not speak russian and that you speak english instead.
Ok. I wrote "Hi! I don't speak Russian. Can you please reply in English, Ukrainian or Hebrew?"
bring the issue to the public mailing list of the english wikipedia. Also ask them why they ban anyone who simply removes part of an article without committing vandalism.
Can't do that, because I'm banned. Currently I'm researching this subject. There is just so many evil stuff about Russian Wikipedia. I.e. there is rampant sexist and homophobic articles, advocating say compulsory psychiatric treatment of LGBTQ people. I'm compiling an article, which I will send to western tech media outlets, hope that will force Wikimedia to change Russian Wikipedia's administration.
Among Russian Wikipedists, homophobia and sexism are rampant. For example, the article "Homonegativism", which quotes homophobes, like the Russian sexologist M. Beylkin, which insists on the compulsory treatment of gays and the change of their orientation to heterosexual. That article is absent in other languages. Among the sexists was a member of the Union of Writers of the Russian Federation, Nikolai Eikhvald, who opposed the holding of a women's wiki-marathon. And on the justified statement of the fact of sexism on Wikipedia, from Russian there comes a boorish answer "why do journalists support this nonsense about sexism", implying apparently some "conspiracy" aimed at destroying their patriarchal world, in which Russians can get drunk and beat their wives with impunity. On the attempts of women to investigate the subject of longstanding discrimination, the Russians declare "" gender studies "- this is quackery, pseudoscience," further harshly hinting that the wikipedia articles written by women are "rubbish, and deserve only criticism." They don't hesitate to point out and insulting a woman's place "after all, a man usually kills mammoths, and the woman cooks them and sits with children." After that go nasty sexist jokes about "Systemic deviations caused by the centuries-old oppression of women"
