Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Morals

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-24 4:19

What do you value in life? List specific things instead of labels such as political parties.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 13:22

>>40
Have more abortions, problem solved.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 13:37

>>41

Liberals: it's okay to kill babies
Also liberals: it's NOT okay to separate illegal immigrant children from their parents

Really makes you think.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 13:39

Comforts are key element of civilization.
If you see all comfort as hedonism, you're welcome to live with the monkeys in the jungles while it lasts.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 13:40

>>43

Stop derailing the discussion. I said way more than just comfort. But you ignored the rest and focused in on that.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 13:54

>>44
You mean gems like this?
In other words, not caring about your community. It's important to be a part of a group that's bigger than yourself. Individuality is antisocial. You don't have to let other people dictate your entire personality, because that would be dumb. But too much individuality harms community. No man is an island.


Individuality is antisocial! Praise China and hive mind mentality.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 14:03

>>45
Did you just ignore the following sentences?

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 14:12

>>42
Also liberals: it's NOT okay to separate illegal immigrant children from their parents
How is that wrong?

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 15:36

>>47
It seems that over the past decades America has turned from the country of freedom and capitalism into the country of limits and socialism, because it was previously unthinkable that someone would tell a private entrepreneur whom he must hire, or that useless lumpen proletarians will receive wealthfare and a medicine at the expense of other people. This all led me to think that one of the main problems of our time lies in the institute of citizenship and its accompanying problems.

Citizenship is an instrument of discrimination, invented in ancient Greece and Rome, when society was divided into citizens and slaves (helots). Today citizenship is used by self-styled xenophobes to oppress non-citizens. Citizens should feel ashamed and guilty for their undeserved privileges. Nothing makes a citizen better than an illegal immigrant. For private business, citizens are immature, spoiled and capricious employees who tend to demand too much from the employer. And while homeowners bought their homes, citizens, on the other hand, did not pay anything for their citizenship. We live in the 21st century, where there is no place for discrimination based on religion, nationality or nation. Now is the time to abolish citizenship and undeserved privileges associated with it.

The argument of a citizen is this: my parents created this country and left it for me, so America is now mine. My dad built this railroad for Rockefeller, so it belongs to me, not to Rockefeller, so Rockefeller has no right to hire Mexican workers on this railway. Then the citizen uses abusive delusions and generalizations, implying that all Mexicans are criminals who illegally smuggle drugs, rather than admit that it is just a small minorty of Mexicans affiliated with cartels whp engaged in this, with the support of the US citizens themselves. Opponents of illegal immigration are the same sexists and chauvinists who enslave women and insist that the woman's place is in the kitchen.

There is nothing wrong with illegal immigration, because no human being is "illegal", except for the fact that immigrants make angry these lazy xenophobes and other neo-Nazis. Illegal immigrants are invited by businesses that are willing to provide them with work, food and shelter. Illegal immigrants can also pay taxes if the government gives them permission to work. At the same time, a lazy white person should not have the right to work and receive high wages only on the fact of his birth in the United States. If we open borders and allow the free movement of human capital, the cost of labor will drop to the average world level and all products will become cheaper. If a citizen is not ready to work for a lower salary, then he is simply not competitive and is a burden for the economy and taxpayers. Illegal immigrants are human beings and have human rights, including the right to compete for work under fair rules. Immigration laws are simply obsolete and should be abolished. Oppose Nazism - support illegal immigration.

Regarding to immigration laws: illegal immigration is not a crime, because there is no victim. And when the law oppresses people, there is nothing wrong with breaking such a cannibalistic law. Immigration laws are racist, xenophobic and violate human rights, so they do not deserve respect. Period.

Country borders must be abolished. In our time there is no place for borders; humanity deserves free movement of labor and goods. To achieve world balance, peace and progress, we need to have borderless world. Immigration laws can and should be abolished. Moreover, the borders between countries should be recognized as illegal. Likewise, citizenship must be abolished so that all people receive equal rights, since people deserve equal rights from birth, regardless of the country of birth. Only xenophobic followers of Hitler want to limit immigrants' rights. There is only one race - the human race, therefore immigration laws should be abolished as slavery, because they are not suitable for the 21st century.

Citizenship is an undeserved privilege, not your private property. You did not pay for your citizenship, you have no proof of purchase, Mr. lazy fat white citizen. If you are a US citizen, then you can view America as your country, as well as something to be inspired by, but America is not your property, America is not your house, not your inheritance, because inheritance is what you own, but you do not own America, America is no more your property than your wife, your manager in the workplace or your president, America deserves to be open to all, America is a country of immigrants. I repeat: America is not your property, America deserves freedom from xenophobic Nazis. Freedom for Mexicans is freedom for America.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 15:57

over the past decades
Yeah no. What about the prohibition? What about the WWII era? What about the forced sterilization programmes?

freedom
Good

capitalism
Bad

limits
Bad

socialism
Good

when society was divided into citizens and slaves (helots)
They also had foreigners who were not citizens nor slaves.

There is nothing wrong with illegal immigration, because no human being is "illegal", except for the fact that immigrants make angry these lazy xenophobes and other neo-Nazis
I will agree with this.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 16:51

>>48-49
get the fuck out, liberal shills

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 17:58

>>50
I don't think that you know what liberalism is, Capitalism is part of liberalism.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-25 18:41

>>51
yeah and it sucks ass
we need a planned economy and an authoritarian right government

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-26 16:22

>>52
Authoritarianism = "I don't like X so nobody should be able to do such X even if it affects only themselves. Also, free speech is overrated".

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-26 21:04

>>53
free speech allows for subversion

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-27 0:06

>>55
controlled speech allows for github?

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-27 0:47

>>16
Free markets fix it
why do ancapistani fucks love jew cock up their ass so goddamn much

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-27 4:01

>>53

Authoritarianism = people who know what the human race should do (not destroy earth, move to other planets, not import tons of non-white immigrants into white countries, etc) being in charge and not letting plebs subvert society for the sake of ``muh personal freedums''

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-27 6:36

>>57
USA was the big innovator in space travel, environmental protection, segregating niggers, etc. and accomplished all that without authoritarianism. Authoritarian countries have actually always failed to compete, showing that human intelligence and creativity increases through the play and experimentation that comes from not having a boot stomping their face.

You can choose racial homogeneity over authoritarianism, which is what the USA did until they were kiked. The police weren't "militarized" where there were no niggers, and everybody liked them. Judges weren't handing down 100 year sentences when there were no niggers, and crime didn't spiral out of control. There was no welfare until the 50s, and nobody bitched and moaned. The only reason to demand authoritarianism is because you are too cucked to admit that niggers are the real problem.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-27 21:45

The winners decide how to tell History. History creates morals. They are the Super Men, the source of all values. It is necessary to deconstruct all values, not simply compare them. Most of what you value in life has been sold to you, pre-made, by some thinker or another, trying to create in his mind an argument that would convince the greatest amount of people. Be the source of your own values.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-27 22:10

>>58
but they are caused by soft government that tolerates too much

authoritarian regimes don't put up with bullshit

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 6:21

>>59
It is necessary to deconstruct all values, not simply compare them
Why don't you start by "deconstructing" why you should bother to "deconstruct" all values in the first place? It is ridiculously arrogant to think that you are even able to conceive of the reasoning behind common values, since these values formed over thousands of years of trial and error while your mind only formed by reading a few shitty postmodern books by Jewish boomers in the 50s.

And since these values you claim need to be deconstructed are part of the social fabric that keeps you entertained, slovenly, and not-murdered, you can only attempt to deconstruct them if you reject all fruits of the society that birthed them. That does of course include this website. You will need to leave.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 7:09

>>61
I don't need to reject a value simply because I deconstruct it. You seem to fail to grasp what deconstruction is. It means removing the sacred aspect of it, and finding out its true origins and nature. I might find a better criterium for my actions than simply doing what's popular.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 7:26

>>62
To be fair, it seems as though you completely misinterpreted my post. This raises further questions in regards to the arrogance and folly you are displaying by claiming you are capable of deconstruction. "Removing the sacred aspect" is just a $5 way of saying "understanding" and I am here to tell you that you will never understand common values because they are emergent from the collective and so are you. It is completely pointless to attempt to understand such things while being within the system emerging from the values you are trying to understand. Tht's why you need to reject every aspect of common society, such as the internet, to begin "deconstructing".

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 7:28

>>63
hurr durr don't think, just accept.

t. brainlet

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 10:10

postmodernism is people just claiming everything is a social construct that you can deconstruct and that nothing means anything

edgy reductionist nihilistic pseudointellectual bullshit

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 10:24

>>65
That post unironically is a (poor) deconstruction of postmodernism.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 10:28

>>66

postmodernist faggot detected

``anything I don't like is a social construct''

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 11:11

>>67
``Anything i don't like is cultural marxism''

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 11:20

>>68
triggered

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 16:04

I love postmodernism.
Just because the name implies it is very futuristic. I believe postmodernism is the future, therefore I believe in it.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 16:30

>>70
What is your opinion on postpostmodernism?

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 16:51

>>65
Nothing means anything a priori, but meaning can be constructed.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 16:56

I’m a postmodernist. Everything you support is a social construct, therefore your beliefs are invalid. Everything I believe in is better. I am so smart and superior to everyone. Why don’t people love me? Don’t people see how intelligent and deep I am for dismissing everyone else’s views?

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 18:06

>>73
If your values are a product of society, which you simply bought into without any real analysis on your part, then that's something to think about.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 18:30

We live in a society

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-28 19:50

>>75
I mean values you had no participation in the creation of. A byproduct of past times, mostly. They are not necessarily invalid, but some were created in order to solve a need that just isn't there anymore, and only remain because they've become popular. For instance, the demonization of racism only appeared on the post-war, to stop the ideology from the losing side from spreading and thus to cement victory, but we still see its unintended side-effects to this day

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-29 2:43

>>74

My views go against what people want me to believe and value.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-29 2:45

Everyone here is super liberal. I am not. If I just went with the flow, and didn’t really think for myself, I’d end up liberal by default. But I do think about things, and I have independently arrived at my own conclusions. Although actually I guess you could say I am conservative BECAUSE of being surrounded by unironic SJWs.

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-29 3:02

>>78
That doesn't make much sense, most conservatives are liberals..

Name: Anonymous 2018-06-29 11:41

>>79
t. proud liberal-conservative radical centrist.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List