Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Christains are worthless trash, barely sentient shit stains

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-17 7:56

Why don't they catch more heat on this board? Let's get a Christian hate thread pumping!

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-24 21:54

Pedos trying to slide this.

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-25 13:45

#WeWillNotBeSlid

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-26 12:09

This thread is important

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-06 13:34

No thread on page 0 is more important than this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-06 16:26

>>44
Now that's damning with faint praise!

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-06 22:30

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-07 13:35

>>46
>le pedophile sage

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 12:25

Up

Name: Asshole 2018-11-08 14:20

Imagine a home depot paint bucket full of shit and piss left to sit for weeks. Imagine taking your head and submerging it up to your shoulders in the shit and piss. Imagine opening your mouth and sticking out your tongue and swallowing a big gulp of the shit and piss.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 10:26

Imagine a church full of children and priests. Imagine the priests performing christian love on the screaming, crying children.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 22:31

>>50
Hot.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 22:37

>>51
You must be Catholic

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-15 13:17

For some reason this wasn't on page 0. Fixing

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 13:13

Zero

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 13:13

Also dubs

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-19 22:00

Let me make an opening confession. I am not a LGBTI person. I do not share their experiences, nor have I lived their story. I must also confess no little bit of guilt in this matter. I have been quick to judge how LGBTI views adversely affect me without me considering how my views might adversely affect them. I have often clung onto a particular vision of society, a society that feels like it is crumbling before my eyes, but without ensuring the welfare of the most vulnerable in that society.

In addition, part of me has been selfishly worried that some of the perks and privileges that my tribe has enjoyed in Australian society are being taken away. While I have been pre-occupied with how to preserve a Christian witness in a post-Christian society, I know I have neglected to love all the people in this society as my faith requires me to.

I also know that the history of LGBTI people in Australia is a tragic saga about the struggle for existence, acceptance, and equality amidst the heaping of shame, barrages of abuse, and experiences of rejection. I have seen it and must ashamedly confess that I have before failed to speak out against it. I say with genuine contrition that I genuinely do not wish to add to the history of hurt that LGBTI people have experienced.

Given that story, if the plebiscite goes ahead, and if the Yes-campaign won, I would totally understand the celebration and joy of LGBTI people, feeling as if their ship had finally come home

But what I want to do is explain why I don’t believe in same sex marriage. But let’s be honest, we all know that this is a hard ask. Not because such an argument does not exist, it does, and I’ll happily show it to you. But as soon as I say “no” to same-sex marriage, I’m certain that some people will look at me as if I’ve just declared that the sky is green, brussels sprout is the best flavour of ice cream, and the Melbourne Zoo should consider opening a scorpion petting exhibit for toddlers. The proposition sounds absurd and offensive to many people for whom same sex marriage is as self-evident as 2+2= 4 or having vegemite on toast for brekky. There are people who honestly think that the only reason for opposing same sex marriage is because you are either a radicalised Muslim who sleeps at night with an ISIS flag for a blanket or else you are a Bible-thumping Christian fundamentalist who hates LGBTI people like Donald Trump hates Megyn Kelly.

But what if there was a parallel universe where it was possible to set forth a reasonable, sensible, and non-homophobic case against legalising same-sex marriage. Even though it is obviously impossible in our world, perhaps, with a bit of science-fiction, maybe there is an alternative reality where a case for traditional marriage actually makes sense.

So I invite you to hop into my reality-alternator-machine for just a moment and to hear me out. If you don’t like what I say, you can always try me for heresy later, or even worse, tie me to a chair, glue my eye-lids open, and force me to watch re-runs of Al Gore speeches.

The Faith Factor

Like it or not, around 60% of Australians identify as Christian, with 2.5% identifying as Muslim, and 0.5% are Jewish. There are a diversity of opinions about marriage and sexuality between these religions and diverse opinions even within these religions. In any case, we must countenance the fact that a majority of Australians identify with one of the Abrahamic religions, characterised by belief in one God, who made the world, and often has something to say about human behaviour including marriage.

For persons of faith, marriage is not simply about formalising my relationship status or getting my domestic partnership legally recognised. Rather, marriage is a divinely created institution that exists for the benefit of men and women. Marriage is a divine gift whereby men and women are joined together in a relationship characterised by love, self-giving, and fidelity. Marriage is a sacramental union, a holy covenant of commitment, a celebration of love, an exclusive intimacy, and directed towards helping each other flourish as human beings. For people of faith, marriage is anchored in a sexual ecology; it reflects the divinely designed complementarity of man and woman, at both the biological and relational level. In marriage, a man and a woman are united to love each other in heart, mind, and soul. On the specifically Christian side of things, marriage between men and women is meant to reflect the self-giving and lavish love that Christ has for his Church.

That is the faith argument, it works for some of the 61% of people who subscribe to one of the Abrahamic faiths, but to be truthful, it is not going to convince the 22% of the population who identify as “no religion.”

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-19 22:09

>>56
First, if same-sex marriage is legalised, then it means that you can take any relationship you like, stick a ring on it, and demand that people recognise it as marriage. We will be entering into a place where, as they say in the great state of Massachusetts, “If you can carry it, you can marry it.” But seriously, if same-sex marriage is legalised then we have to ask if there remains any legal argument against incest and polyamory as marriage. The main thing driving same-sex marriage is a strong belief in personal autonomy and the intent to establish the equality of relationships analogous to traditional marriage before the law. The principal argument is: I want to be married to this person, so law and conventions be damned, start calling it a marriage! But what happens if the relationships people want to call “marriage” suddenly become less and less analogous to traditional marriage. If we legalise same-sex marriage then the only arguments against incestuous marriages or polyamorous marriages will be aesthetic rather than legal. I have to tell you that saying, “I think that is just weird and yucky” is not an effective counter-argument against incestuous and polyamorous marriages that will hold up in a court of law. If marriage is based on nothing more than the right of personal autonomy, and if government’s role is to facilitate the legal recognition of the relationships that people want defined as marriage, then one has evacuated any argument against including more unconventional relationships under the mantle of marriage. So, can anyone tell me where the cut-off point is for marriage? Can anyone in the same-sex marriage camp give me a legal and philosophical reason against incestuous and polyamorous marriages other than, “We’re not ready for it yet.”

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-19 22:13

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-20 20:19

Importance of the message in the OP of this thread cannot be overstated.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-20 22:43

>>58
What if I told you that there is no reasonable case for secular marriage to exist at all?

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-21 8:27

>>60
Marriage exists for women to sue half of your property off.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-21 10:02

>>61
Marriage exists for women to sue half of your property off.
No woman can get half your Dick, ie your pass to riches in life's easy mode, in a divorce so where's the issue? Let the bitch have the property, you have the Dick.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-21 15:02

>>62
dick
easy mode
You can't fuck your way into riches if you have a dick.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-21 23:18

>>63
http://www.tmz.com/2018/06/07/jeremy-meeks-chloe-green-baby-boy-born-hot-felon/

The billionaire heiress and her man -- formerly known as the "Hot Felon"

Jeremy and Chloe started dating just about a year ago, not too long after he was released from a California prison

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-21 23:35

>>64
Had I been her dad, I would have denied her inheritance, donating it to university research departments and libraries.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-22 1:32

>>65
If you were her dad you would be a freaky kike and probably jerk off about the situation https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6318025/Inside-life-foul-mouthed-bully-Sir-Philip-Green.html

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-22 3:09

>>66
I doubt Jewish dad wants his daughter to marry a good for nothing felon, unless he is Al Capone or something.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-22 6:21

>>67
Are you crazy or simply missing screws? Philip Green is a massively jewy nigger-enabler, working with beyonce etc. He loves felons and good for nothings if they are subversive.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-23 13:48

Due to a glitch in the board software, this thread was not displayed on page 0.
A workaround is to periodically reply in it to keep it where it should be.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-25 13:35

Important

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-29 22:29

Necessary knowledge

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-01 18:20

This should be a sticky

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 15:50

Anyone noticed how christians pretend to be compatible with science, but then immediately attack scientific consensus afterwards?

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 16:23

kill yourself

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 16:23

is that ass wet

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 16:24

is that ass wet

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 16:24

is that ass wet

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 16:24

is that ass wet

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-02 16:24

is that ass wet

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-03 5:27

Yeah, had some nice liquid poop today and I did not wipe.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List