Wikipedia

Got banned at Wikipedia for asking about The Daily Stormer mentioning that Al Moor mosque was a terrorist recruiting center
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Removing_links_to_The_Daily_Stormer_from_article_talk_pages

TLDR: even metioning The Daily Stormer strongly prohibited by Wikipedia rules. Despite that the article DS cited were just retelling official US statement about terrorists liquidated by drone strikes.

And despite me swearing that I'm not a nazi or a racist, I was still banned for being "a racist troll", because I recommended people chatting with real Muslims and reading Quran, instead of visiting the hate filled Nazi sties, like KC.

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2019/03/20/was-brenton-tarrant-a-partisan-or-a-terrorist/

Most, but not all, of my VPN data centers, even most, but not all, USA ones, are blocking DailyStormer. All European and Asian data centers seem to block it.

>>4
Have they heard about the first amendment?

Yesterday, NikitaSadkov

Stopped reading there. Finish your're game.

Wikipedia admins are all SJW cucks

Asked them to elaborate on why I was banned:
http://lj.rossia.org/users/sadkov/359672.html

They refused to point me at the precise rules which I broke by posting link to The Daily Stormer at the Al Noor Mosque talk page, saying that my question is "nonsense" and that what I did was "indecent", and I'm either trolling or retarded (and they aren't welcoming idiots), and instead telling me to go back to Russian Wikipedia, because my English is not up to their ridiculous standards. I haven't expected such a rude response from Wikipedia admins. But well you know what? Nobody will force me to speak Russian. And I would love to see what language they will suggest me to speak after I butcher that Russian baby alive? Will that be enough to show everyone that I hate Russia? Because most people seeminly don't understand words. When I tell that I hate Russia, they suggest me to reconcile. That is why I must kill a Russian child and write with his blood "I HATE RUSSIA".

Regarding Russian Wikipedia, I got banned there by questioning why Emir Khattab is branded as terrorist, while he is a freedom fighter. In fact, anyone who kills Russian scum is a freedom fighter.

Also, if you look at the bans they issue, they are almost always for people involved with editing politically loaded articles, like say https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogsbite.org

You wont see someone banned for editing say Quake III page or a page about cat breeds.

Then just spew your politically loaded edits into Quake III and cat breed pages and be done with it.

>>10
For that to be done, you need the next Brenton Tarrant to say something like "Subscribe to Quake done Quick channel!" or make an Al Noor Mosque map for speedrunning.

>>8
Ok. So they told me to go back to Russian Language Wikipedia, because my English is broken, to which I replied that I despise Russia, the Russian nation and consider Russian language deficient and unworthy of existence. Wikipedia admins said that this is trolling and they will never unban me now.

So if I take a Russian baby and tear its belly open, and take out the intestines that would be "trolling", not an act of pure hatred? And the fact I call to genocide Russians is trolling? Well, I guess my prosecutor should know too, because trolling means there is no actual hatred - it all just a joke, and prosecuting me for 282 is wrong, and there is no need to involuntarily commit me into psychiatric ward either, because that is trolling, not a schizophrenia.


https://i.imgur.com/7pcC3EX.png

They censored your link here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Christchurch_mosque_shootings/Archive_7#Al_Noor_Mosque_Was_In_the_News_Before

archive of the op link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1006#Removing_links_to_The_Daily_Stormer_from_article_talk_pages

"Everything I disagree with is trolling"

>>15
Even broken English is a trolling nowadays. So if you're a Slav, remember using these articles.

Why don't you try using using the Ukrainian Wikipedia?

>>17
I'm not Ukrainian. I don't associate myself with any nation or country.

>>18
But everyone associates you with a ruskie because you act like one

>>19
what makes me Russian?

>>20
Burning hamsters alive, slaughtering cocks for fun, and peeing in public.

>>21
Russians dont do that.

>>22
They do so asshole, eat sage

Keep, Because you editors keep behaving as nazis. I am a German citizen and when I was a young boy watched books being burned. You delete article of programming language because they are "not notable". By your definition, "Puff Daddy" are "not notable" to me. I should propose to delete their article. There is nothing wrong with information. You are nazis. To hell with you. 79.169.56.225 (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

>>24
Deletionists are the modern inquisition. They have some sick purity standard to cull any Wiki article they feel is "weakly sourced" or "original research".
They also have a sense of accomplishment by denying information, gives each other pats on the back and affirm Request for Deletions for their friends like a brigade of vandals - except they're entrenched in the power hierarchy. Leftists can mount opposition to their shenanigans with their own brigades, but other groups lack admin allies and numbers to oppose deletionists.

>>25
Actually, they don't delete everything, only controversial political topics they dislike. There they do everything to ban you without any warning. Guess that is one more proof that Daily Stormer tells truth, even if in an exaggerated form. Leftist Jews control and censor everything.

>>26
What political controversy was sleepsort involved with? What about thousands of articles that have zero relation to politics?
https://deletionpedia.org/en/Main_Page

>>27
Probably some personal attention-whoring pages. Usually people don't get banned for creating these, just warned that they should create pages only about notorious events. The case of Mosque was notorious, because several media outlets reported at different points in time. But we have censorship, suppressing that the Mosque served as terrorist recruitment center.

The Daily Stormer: Jews don't want you to know about this Mosque's past!!!

Wikipedia: you're fucking being perma-banned for bringing up this anti-Islamic shit, we are trying to censor so hard. We are funded by Moshe Kikeberg and Ahmed ben Muhammad.

>>27
Still most censored articles are of political nature, like:
https://deletionpedia.org/en/2017_United_States_Presidential_Inauguration_riots
https://deletionpedia.org/en/2017_United_States-Saudi_Arabia_arms_deal

>>29
Yeah, Wikipedia admins are mostly left-wing and these articles will be on their noticeboard 24/7, but deletionists have lots of conservative pedants - a breed of obstructive bureaucrats who enjoy purging wikipedia of anything they dislike with religious zeal.

>>30
Leftists are the biggest conservatives. North Korea has a lot less freedom than the Nazi Germany or the Fascist Italy. To justify their censorship they cite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance yet they keep silent that nationalists in general never achieve completely totalitarian rule, because they are usally limited to smaller group, like i.e. the modern Nazis striving to create white only country, or Israeli Zionists limiting themselves to Israel. But commies want whole world, not just single community, city or country. So the paradox of tolerance first of all applies to leftists.

>>31
Leftism is merely a survival strategy for those who could not survive without a powerful government taking from the strong to give to the weak. Since civilization creates a huge surplus of such people, any form of social organization beyond 'rule of bands' is going to turn authoritarian leftist due to faggy weakness flourishing in the people.

>>32
Leftists will be the first to end up in Gulag. Comrade Stalin started with killing his best friends, like Kirov.

>>33
One-party states eventually settle into a monarchy-lite with court intrigues, show trials and secret prisons - dressed in a heavy dose of propaganda to justify the actions of a Dear Leader(totally not a king). North Korea is a one of last surviving examples.

>>34
Another one is Wikipedia. Especially the Russian one, which cosplays USSR.

>>31

the modern Nazis striving to create white only country

They will still hang you if you are a homo or a pedo no matter your color.

>>36
That depends on the Nazis. Many Nazis don't really care about pedos or homos, as these don't pose any existential threat on their own, unless organized by 3rd party. I.e. Jews in Israel could be considered Nazis, yet they don't really care about gays, compared to Muslims.