Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Fifth Wave Trans-Communism

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 20:21

Aren't they going to contradict basic marxism if all it becomes some sort of sexual fetishism movement where classes are replaced by genders and capital by privileges? How far does the ideology of cultural marxism can be extended?

totally not real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
Cultural Marxism is a far-right and antisemitic conspiracy theory which claims Western Marxism as the basis of continuing academic and intellectual efforts to subvert Western culture.
The conspiracists claim that an elite of Marxist theorists and Frankfurt School intellectuals are subverting Western society with a culture war that undermines the Christian values of traditionalist conservatism and promotes the cultural liberal values of the 1960s counterculture and multiculturalism, progressive politics and political correctness, misrepresented as identity politics created by critical theory.[2][3][4][5]

While the theory originated in the United States during the 1990s,[6](Abstract) it entered mainstream discourse in the 2010s and is promoted globally.[6] Today, the conspiracy theory of Marxist culture war is promoted by right-wing politicians, fundamentalist religious leaders, political commentators in mainstream print and television media and white supremacist terrorists.[7] Scholarly analysis of the conspiracy theory has concluded that it has no basis in fact and no intellectual movement by that name.[6][8]

real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Left
The New Left was a broad political movement mainly in the 1960s and 1970s consisting of activists in the Western world who campaigned for a broad range of social issues such as civil and political rights, feminism, gay rights, abortion rights, gender roles and drug policy reforms.[1] Some saw the New Left as an oppositional reaction to earlier Marxist and labor union movements for social justice that focused on dialectical materialism and social class, while others who used the term saw the movement as a continuation and revitalization of traditional leftist goals.[2][3][4]

real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freudo-Marxism
Freudo-Marxism is a loose designation for philosophical perspectives informed by both the Marxist philosophy of Karl Marx and the psychoanalytic theory of Sigmund Freud. It has a rich history within continental philosophy, beginning in the 1920s and 1930s and running through critical theory, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and post-structuralism.

The Frankfurt theorists proposed that social theory was inadequate for explaining the turbulent political factionalism and reactionary politics occurring in 20th century liberal capitalist societies. Critical of capitalism and of Marxism–Leninism as philosophically inflexible systems of social organization, the School's critical theory research indicated alternative paths to realizing the social development of a society and a nation.[1]

real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School
The Frankfurt School perspective of critical investigation (open-ended and self-critical) is based upon Freudian, Marxist and Hegelian premises of idealist philosophy.[2] To fill the omissions of 19th-century classical Marxism, which did not address 20th-century social problems, they applied the methods of antipositivist sociology, of psychoanalysis, and of existentialism.[3] The School's sociologic works derived from syntheses of the thematically pertinent works of Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and Karl Marx, of Sigmund Freud and Max Weber, and of Georg Simmel and Georg Lukács.[4][5]

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 20:46

Don't dirty Marx's name in vain. He has nothing to do with those faggots.

And yes, Freud was a faggot; I have it written in a book.

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 21:35

Freudian philosophy has much more influence on current Brave New World politics that people expect, while the psychoanalysis was debunked as primitive and mechanistic, the core tenet of Freud's philosophy, the concept of libido as central power reduces the human into an animalistic-instinctual machine that is driven by lust and reproductive instinct, was wholly embraced, denying the progress from "psychosexual" savagery of primitive tribes toward civilization and social roles where sex is regulated and ritualized process.
Freud subverted all that by promoting libido and Id(a personification of instinct and validation of humans as animals) as valid parts of humanity, instead of animalistic relicts of ancient part that have to be controlled culturally. It seems like "Sexual freedom" has evolved into a form of uncontrolled mental corruption and deviation that normalizes fetishes and paraphilias that leverage far-left "tolerance" to break the Overton window on sexuality and socio-sexul structure - basically turning sexual drive into a new neo-Marxist commodity that fetishistically simulates labor value(wonder why trannies demand sex from straight men? Hint: its not "sexual equality") and turning the deviants into revolutionary taboo-breakers who rebel against authority of "sexual norms and morals"(aka patriarchy). End-result: civilization centralizes sexual fetishes and degenerates culturally towards primitive "psycho-sexuals" following their animalistic needs, replacing intellectual drive with the emotional judgement and group thinking, a collectivist hive mind mentality that normalizes pathological(trans-sexualism) and deviant(LGBT activism and lifestyle) as core parts of Western culture, rewriting history and manipulating public opinion towards accepting more extreme interpretations of moral relativism - tolerance as supreme virtue, bigotry as sin, pathological hyper-altruism as moral ideal and progress for the sake of progress(acceleration-ism).

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 22:15

The society of Open Sexuality, the mythical ideal which Freudists desire so much, cannot exist in reality.
STDs prevent the "free expression" and sexual repulsion prevent "free association", nudism is contradicted by death from exposure/weather and "educational pornography" traumatizes children(deforming their sexual interests).
Sex has to be 'repressed' and 'controlled' for a stable and prosperous society, with "free sex" undermining family structures and cheapening inter-personal relations towards a society of atomized strangers who have nothing in common besides temporary sexual attraction. Evolution doesn't select for "who has the most sex", but who procreates most: the libido-central human that is driven to satisfaction of desires views procreation as some unnecessary side effect - specifically a woman who views pregnancy as something to avoid while deriving maximum pleasure from her sexual adventures is the "exhibit A" of Freudian "Psycho-sexual" revolution driven by artificial hormone fumes of birth control and evaporation of moral integrity in favor of sexual satisfaction.
Not to exclude men: pornography allows an easy and effective release from any sexual desire, in effect abstracting desire to something that can depicted as simulacrum of that desire in visual form: the virtual reality where "sexual fantasy" occurs subverts rational mind, as addictive power of simulacra eradicates plans for serious future where family and procreation seen as too "demanding, remote and hypothetically dangerous" while porn is always at hands reach. The idea of family, itself destroyed by decades of predatory divorce laws and feminist cultural infiltration(operating on foundation of Freudo-marxist Equality of Sexes) further get devalued with concept of open relationships and lack of strong bonds between psychologically distanced partners who are viewing each as means for sexual release rather than people, the 'family' of modern western civilization is not based on trust or respect, there is a regression to animalistic "mating pair"(e.g. "cohabitation") and loss of family ties between children(daycares, nannies, kindergartens - the critical time at which children establish their persona and family relationships) and parents(who have to work and don't want to waste time on children - they want sex and money).

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 22:53

The Permanent Cultural Revolution will be Pay-for-view.
Onlyfans is the symptoms of cultural rot, where people in capitalist society finally realize their libidinal energy has economic value and begin to prostitute their life experience for the virtual community of "fans"(a modern idea of fan is fairly close to the "cult of personality" dispersed towards the rank-and-file of social 'creative class').
We have political commentators, professional feminists, virtual reformers and virtue signalling media personalities working for Patreon and monetizing video content for the eager consumers - the ideology easily becomes the 'cultural product' with a definite price.
People create artificial worlds(webcam show reality) and personas(VTubers) where the core reality of viewer is subsumed into a globalized experience of some simulacrum shared with social networks of alienated and frustrated people who see 'media creators', the proverbial 'creative class' as their mentors and leaders. They don't see the irony of being consumers inside a well-oiled new media structure, they view social networks as something natural - as if websites controlled by megacorporations simulate social relationships and not merely a means of communications. The world culture turns abstract, online and depersonalized "product" to be optimized for spread(virality) and effect(resonance/memeability), rather than any integral quality(lack of novelty) or validity(simulacrum replaces real knowledge). The culture of Online Memes is a stark contrast to the
processes that give birth to these memes: its obvious to anyone that memes are byproducts of different media, yet centrality of memes and their fast/easy replication by digital means create
a fragile, psychotic culture of reaction and mutation, reflexive
judgement and hive mind 'consensus'. Cultural products begin to exploit these animalistic trends and fads, as mainstream culture
gives way to mutant byproducts of media mashups(e.g. AMVs and synthethic animation vs original hand-crafted/drawn animation) and virtual propaganda(image macros vs books and articles), lowering the barrier of entry for the masses in favor of primitive, low-effort culture that epitomizes the "psycho-sexual" society searching for meaning that isn't there.

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 23:10

>>1-5
Nice copy paste faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 23:31

Crowdsourcing and Gig-economy are merely next stages of capitalist exploitation of human being:
Onlyfans,Patreon, Mechanical Turk,Uber,Twitch,all these services and associated "gig" industries commodify the labor into a series of cultural products that operate on mass scale:
instead of "work" the life environment of a person becomes avenues for labor exploitation: driving, singing, dancing,repairing,playing video games, lecturing, etc become commercial activities with subscribers and patrons.
The life itself become commercial activity, as "livestreams" intrude and dictate lives of 'creative class' towards maximizing profit. Like an Uber driver seeking to optimize for profit,
a performer for livestream tends to maximize attention and minimize effort of labor, driving a specific optimization in online culture that results in lowest effort content:
psychologically most engaging but empty cultural chit-chat, memes and politically correct humor, just to preserve subscribers and not alienate the fans.
This shallow culture of 'video prostitution' that "professional streamers" promote doesn't compete by creating something novel:
It reuses cultural products and memetically transforms their references to elevate the status of streamers as "in the know",
aligned with cultural context of fans and subscribers. There nothing more shallow as mimicking the lowest-common denominator views and culture to engage with the audience, but 'creative class' wants to be paid and corrupts its own values to better capture the market of ideas - if streamers rebel against their audience they lose the money and fame they worked all along to achieve, the narcotic effect of "being popular" wears off and they become normals, deprived of their pretentious virtual persona that is the basis of their status and psychological support. This parasocial streamer-audience link can't compare to physical reality of relatioships, yet as safe, packaged product of "psycho-sexual" culture it seems as valid alternative to friendships and love, giving people illusions of meaningful relation to streamers and performers who view them through the lens of monetary relations. Money dictates how streaming, gig economy and "crowd labor"(crowdsourcing) operate: the idea of
independent mind and deeply personal work is overridden by competition through the 'abstract labor pool'(streamers,uber drivers, onlyfans performers) eager for fame and easy profit:
the 'gig worker' is driven to perform what the market demands now, without relation to his desires and plans. The essence of
labor is commodified product for every cultural/economic field,
to do X for Y, is reductio ad absurdum of capitalist societies(for more interesting aspects see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_market )

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-25 23:39

>>6
So what is the source material?
Is everything that become copypasta meme, destined to be a part of cultural context and texts which do not get relegated into the dustbin of history? The implicit assumption here, is that copypasta is the authoritative source material from the creative class and common man can only 'paste' it for reference(No Original Research) without being able to create it: the low effort culture assumes that anyone capable of creating a copypasta is not going to waste time in response to a thread,so content has to be a copy of earlier,depersonalized(anonymous) texts with no specific audience(to paste anywhere) which are accepted by meme culture hive mind as valid "copypasta". is that right?

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-26 0:04

Politically Correct reality has a "liberal bias": x-ist facts and problematic statistics are denied exposure to preserve the status quo of 'progressive, liberal society'. This obviously doesn't correspond to 'brute facts' and creates an artificial culture where facts are relegated to a secondary role of rationalizing ideology and cultural values of Politically Correct reality.
The modern media operates in the interest of market value of itself as 'infotainment source', where appeal to the viewer is more important than accurate reporting and cultural alignment is the only form of judgement that is valid due audience acceptance. Cultural Marxism underscore this phenomenon by denying objective reality exists at all, instead being a purpose-less 'collection of ideas' to be manipulated at will to achieve political ends. The reality of CM proponents diverges from the norm most where 'Socially Constructed' genders and privileges clash with biological reality and economic stratification respectively, the Cultural Marxist cannot view a single 'brute fact' of reality without assigning it a specific cultural context and author, who will be criticized & debunked and the cultural context will be deconstructed: the CM attacks the 'fact' as an idea that can be refuted by circumstances of its creation. Cultural Marxism asylum of 'socially constructed' reality can include anything at all, from families to atoms:
The science and facts mean very little if you can derive biases out of thin air and haggle over definitions to promote your own perspective, undermining neutrality in favor of inherent biases and cultural preferences to have to be deconstructed to the core, leaving no meaning and no purpose to ideas.

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-26 2:04

You aren't talking about their weapons and means of perpetuation!

The average person takes anything an academic says as fact because "it was said by an academic".

There's no means to combat that, except by controlling the 51% of academic positions, in a mad academic game.

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-26 4:26

>>10
The average person takes anything an academic says as fact because "it was said by an academic".
The actual power lies with the media, they used "proved by science" as argument from authority: the actual science
is referenced only in shallow pop-culture way, the role of authority is in science journalist. "The ethics of science journalism" is the real issue, not the number of Cultural Marxist scientists researching gender(they needed just a few).
Once the media and culture sets the tone, the terms of research
and science itself are limited by authority. You have to ask "Who funds Science?Who pays the grants? Who sponsors research?"
The scientists are not merely "neutral researchers", they work for
cold hard cash, even communist block science was based on what kind of research was paid and what research wasn't granted resources for. The age of "Independent scientists" like Tesla is over, scientists are in their 99.99% mass are bound to their institutions and organizations which dictate how they can research science - there are specific laws, grant systems and funding channels which control "Modern Science" from schools labs to prestigious institutes. Looking only at academics is misleading.

Name: Anonymous 2020-10-26 5:05

Heres how transgenderism was born(Magnus Hirschfeld work was a precedent, but not developed into the modern 'transgender identity' and subsequent 'gender reassignment'):
https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/david-reimer-and-john-money-gender-reassignment-controversy-johnjoan-case
You would normally think this is a fiasco and end of scientific career, but John Money was riding a wave of success despite all of critique: he was considered a pioneer and visionary scientist.
Without a well funded media machine that promoted him, what would he become? A pariah who experiments on children and validates clinical insanity using hand-crafted definitions of gender?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List