/prog/ - *takes a moment of silence to remember the old /prog/*

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 1:32

[rem][/rem]

Name: not a bump 2013-09-03 1:32

fuck

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 1:34

...

Name: just 2013-09-03 1:36

Don't bump

Name: ☑ in all fields 2013-09-03 1:38

☑ in all fields

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 2:08

!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 6:01

``Arrakis teaches the attitude of the knife - chopping off what's incomplete and saying: `Now, it's complete because it's ended here.' ''

Name: Admin 2013-09-03 9:07

Wow, the old /prog/ is completely dead right now. All threads on the front page are spam and capped at 1000 posts.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 12:00

>>11
The trick he used is replying to post already at 1k, with Lain, and manually wrote the captcha. Whatever.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:39

I made a new thread (`123456789') and it was deleted, so the mods definitely know. Question is, how did they fuck that up for new threads, but not for replies when logically they would use the same variable? Also, reporting works again, where as before it was giving a MySQL error for a while. moot must be trying to rewrite Shii_{_{_t}}chan or something.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:43

>>16
what a bunch of buffoons. What about the 5-12 other people that use world4ch? What will become of them?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:45

http://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/thread/36487880#p36488232

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:07

>>17
RedCream and the /lounge/ crew have tablecat. /vip/ probably won't be bothered too much. I don't know what the deal with /lang/ is, as I haven't even bothered to check up on them in years. /abbc/ is ('-`)b and doesn't seem concerned. /newnew/ and /newpol/ were filled with transients anyway I think, so they don't matter. /comp/ and /tech/ always belonged to /g/, so fuck 'em. /sjis/ might have a problem. The rest are unimportant, but I'm sure the SEO shitheads will miss the easy backlinks from 4chan.

By the way, we should probably get a scrape of the rest of the boards, in case worse comes to worse. I don't have very much bandwidth, so can I ask this as a favor please?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:11

>>20
Yeah, I'm on it now. It could take a very long time. Hopefully I get it all before it is taken down.

Name: >>21 2013-09-04 4:34

I'm scraping /lounge/ right now. I'll scrape them sorted by highest activity. Although /sjis/ is a treasure. I may have to do that next.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:42

>>20,>>21
It's going to be taken down?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:52

>>23
I doubt it, but you never know. moot may decide if his incompetent code monkey can't add captcha to the text boards without breaking the thread submission box, then maybe they aren't worth the trouble.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:19

>>25
I'll get the shitty small boards tomorrow, just in case they have anything interesting: /food/, /book/, /sports/, /anime/, /sci/, /music/, /carcom/, /img/, and /tele/. I doubt anyone else will want them, but I'll archive and upload them for anyone who does.

Name: FrozenVoid 2013-09-04 5:23

>>26
With a diverse userbase some might want to post on topics which aren't programming.(/sci/, /music/ and /anime/ for example)

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:26

>>27
Fuck off, retard. We aren't trying to build the next reddit here.

Name: FrozenVoid 2013-09-04 5:29

>>28
So you suggest that your /prog/ will be filled with off-topic posts?
IF you want a good signal-to-noise ratio you have to segregate the content.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:34

frozenvoid, you're being really annoying again. I'm happy to have you back, but go smoke some weed or something and come back later.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:49

Isn't it possible to write a user script to find the new thread form and correct the action URL so it's not %FORUMURL% ? I would look into this, but I can't be bothered when the site is full of spammers and necrobumpers anyway...

Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:05

>>30
I'm fine with adding a lounge board, but I won't add single interest boards, the site has just started and it's best not to fragment it right from the beginning.

Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:05

>>30
I meant to quote >>29

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:14

>>33
That's cool. I'm still going to archive all of world4ch, compress it, and upload it somewhere so those left there can view something of their past.

Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:29

>>35
You're welcome to do that. All of /prog/ in an xz is only 48MB. If the entire archive of world4ch is small enough, I could also host it here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:38

>>36
What is xz? Is that 7zip trickery?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:44

>>37
No, it's a program/file format that implements the LZMA2 compression algorithm. Comes standard on most Linux distributions, and is far better than 7zip.

man xz

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:47

wonderful!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:50

So it's all just algorithms... I can come up with my own, my own better algorithms.

*takes a moment of silence to remember the old /prog/*

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 1:32

2 Name: not a bump 2013-09-03 1:32

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 1:34

4 Name: just 2013-09-03 1:36

5 Name: ☑ in all fields 2013-09-03 1:38

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 2:08

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 6:01

11 Name: Admin 2013-09-03 9:07

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 12:00

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:39

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:43

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:45

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:07

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:11

22 Name: >>21 2013-09-04 4:34

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:42

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:52

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:19

27 Name: FrozenVoid 2013-09-04 5:23

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:26

29 Name: FrozenVoid 2013-09-04 5:29

30 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:34

31 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:49

33 Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:05

34 Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:05

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:14

36 Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:29

37 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:38

38 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:44

39 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:47

40 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:50

takes a moment of silence to remember the old /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 1:32

Name: not a bump 2013-09-03 1:32

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 1:34

Name: just 2013-09-03 1:36

Name: ☑ in all fields 2013-09-03 1:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 2:08

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 6:01

Name: Admin 2013-09-03 9:07

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 12:00

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:39

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:43

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 3:45

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:07

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:11

Name: >>21 2013-09-04 4:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:42

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:52

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:19

Name: FrozenVoid 2013-09-04 5:23

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:26

Name: FrozenVoid 2013-09-04 5:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:49

Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:05

Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:05

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:14

Name: Admin 2013-09-04 6:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:44

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 6:50