/prog/ - PROGRAMING LANGUAGES ARE SYNTACTIC SUGAR

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 13:31

THIS IS YOUR DAILY REMINDER THAT ALL ~~PROGRAMMING~~ LANGUAGES ARE
NOTHING MORE THAN SYNTACTIC SUGAR FOR MACHINE CODE.

Name: mailto:sage 2013-09-03 13:43

Ruby considered syntactic diabetes.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 13:55

>>2
I laughed hard.

Name: Perl syntatic meth 2013-09-03 14:18

>>1 Why its called assembly code/language, and the abstracts are called high level languages. The thing you do not want is syntactic grammar display syntactic sugar in ambiguous constructs. E.g. Lua, perl, now ruby.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 17:35

>>4
wHAT.

Name: Admin 2013-09-03 17:38

>>5
He's had too much syntactic meth.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 17:44

>>6
(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:23

programming is data entry of the touhouing machine.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:45

Syntax evaluating syntax.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:49

ani evaluating ani.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:31

Why do they call it syntactic ``sugar''? Is it because sugar is an additive that most food can do without? Why not call it ``syntactic salt'' or ``syntactic MSG'' or ``syntactic HCFS''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 7:30

>>2
More like ^''rabies_,, ...

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 16:03

>>11
It makes the language "sweeter" for human use.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 18:47

>>13
This

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 21:30

>>11
high cructose forn syrup?

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 22:16

Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 23:21

░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░░░░░▀▀▀██████▄▄▄
░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄░░█████████▄
░░░░░▀▀▀▀█████▌░▀▐▄░▀▐█U HAVE BEEN FASTED BY 
░░░▀▀█████▄▄░▀██████▄██
░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░▀▀█▄▀█════█▀
░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▄░░▀▀███░▀░░░░░░▄▄
░░░░░▄███▀▀██▄████████▄░▄▀▀▀██▌
░░░██▀▄▄▄██▀▄███▀░▀▀████░░░░░▀█▄THE FAST MASTER
▄▀▀▀▄██▄▀▀▌████▒▒▒▒▒▒███░░░░▌▄▄▀
▌░░░░▐▀████▐███▒▒▒▒▒▐██▌
▀▄░░▄▀░░░▀▀████▒▒▒▒▄██▀
░░▀▀░░░░░░▀▀█████████▀
░░░░░░░░▄▄██▀██████▀█
░░░░░░▄██▀░░░░░▀▀▀░░█
░░░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░▄▄▄▄█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▄▄▄▄▀▀▄
▌░░░░░▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄▀
░▀▀▄▄▀SEND THIS TO 7 OTHER PEOPLE OR UR TOO SLOW

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 10:18

You're wrong. A program in a HLL can in general be compiled to various different architectures. Machine code cannot in general be compiled to code for a different architecture. Thus, HLLs are qualitatively superior to machine code and surpass it.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 10:38

inb4 Australian Standard Machine Code v1.0

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 13:22

>>18
What about virtual machine code, Mr. Smartypoop?

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 13:29

>>20
That's not real machine code, it can be reverse-engineered no matter what obfuscator you use. Virtual machine code = open sores code.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 14:38

>>21
Check' 'em

PROGRAMING LANGUAGES ARE SYNTACTIC SUGAR

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 13:31

2 Name: mailto:sage 2013-09-03 13:43

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 13:55

4 Name: Perl syntatic meth 2013-09-03 14:18

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 17:35

6 Name: Admin 2013-09-03 17:38

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-03 17:44

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:23

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:45

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 4:49

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 5:31

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 7:30

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 16:03

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 18:47

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 21:30

16 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 22:16

17 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 23:21

18 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 10:18

19 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 10:38

20 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 13:22

21 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 13:29

22 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 14:38