/prog/ - !!! WARNING: COMPUTER SCIENCE IS NOT A REAL SCIENCE. !!!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 17:58

Computer ``Science'' is only a science in the way that ``political
science'', ``library science'', ``military science'', and ``environmental
science'' are ``science''. Its only worth in our universe is to
occupy the time and efforts of people too ignorant to have the
ability to partake in real science, such as mathematics.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:03

No, pure mathematics is above science.

science is for the lowly labrats who can only believe what they see with their own eyes and refuse to use their minds. They don't even believe their minds exist.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:04

social.entertainment.msn.com/tv/blogs/post--vanilla-ice-heading-into-amish-country

Name: mailto:sage 2013-09-04 18:27

CS is computable mathematics.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:38

>>1
ironic, saying that while using a computer

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:39

>>5
fallacy

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:45

Computer science is above everything for the Universe itself is a computer.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 19:01

>>7
It is, huh? Then where's that giant floating space processor? Where's the ram? The operating system? Does it run on plan9?

Name: Rabbi Ya'aqob Menashe 2013-09-04 19:12

>>7
http://youtu.be/OfFFilxJzws

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 19:53

>>8
I can't speak of the rest, but the floating point processor should be obvious. You see the precision errors every day in the form of quantum phenomenon.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 22:23

Computability (or recursion) theory is part of Computer Science and one of the foundations of Mathematics.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-07 17:23

``Computer science'' is not a science and its significance has little to do with computers.

Name: VIPPER 2013-09-22 19:57

>>9
JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 20:22

It is science if you use TDD.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 20:48

>>14
IHNBT

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 21:13

>>12

the science of computation

Die in a fire, retard dawkins dick sucker.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 21:40

>>16
go suck skydaddy's dick, pedopriest apologist

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 22:35

>>17
I'm an atheist and I hate Dawkins.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 22:41

>>18
Why?

Disclaimer: I've never read anything by him.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 21:19

>>15
There is no science in computation. Computation is a matter of maths, it is not a matter of the scientific method.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 21:29

>>19
Because he's one hell of a self-stuck smug faggot who thinks he's superior for calling out on other's religion. Just like every atheist out there.

Yes, this is a textbook case of "i hate all X and I'm the only X in the world who's right", but hell, can't you be an atheist and keep it to yourself? I'm sure nobody cares about my opinions, so why try to force them a la Reddit?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 22:19

>>21

Just like every atheist out there.

Nice generalization.

Yes, this is a textbook case of "i hate all X and I'm the only X in the world who's right", but hell, can't you be an atheist and keep it to yourself? I'm sure nobody cares about my opinions, so why try to force them a la Reddit?

He's not actively shoving his shit down other people's throats (as religious persons often do), and it's not like he's hijacking debates and stuff to advance his agenda. He sounds like a professional master debater to me.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 23:02

what about data science?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 23:03

>>23
Why not get a real job nigger?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 23:07

>>24
my job is quite complex, it has both real and imaginary parts

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-07 1:47

>>20
The scientific method is a trivial overrated thing. it requires no real intelligence to comprehend and use correctly. Pure math is superior just because of the amount of intelligence it requires. Us mathematicians will deal with more higher things while you lowly lab rats can deal with figuring out if men shit larger shits than women.

Basically, the scientific method is "I’ll only believe it if I can see and touch it because my mind is comparable to that of a child" while pure mathematics is "I don't believe or trust that my mind is capable of discovering objective immaterial reality, I know it is capable because I'm a free sentient agent (and a genius one at that) with a divinely inspired intellect and imagination".

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-07 3:15

>>26
That's some fine shit you smoked there.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 0:22

>>24
Why not get a real nigger, Steve?

Name: Steve 2013-10-09 0:27

>>28
Why did you think I wrote that? That guy's a cunt.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 6:29

>>32
U is for Ukelele

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 7:00

>>33
Trix are for kids!

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 8:27

>>31-32
You didn't have to come here, Luke.

!!! WARNING: COMPUTER SCIENCE IS NOT A REAL SCIENCE. !!!

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 17:58

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:03

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:04

4 Name: mailto:sage 2013-09-04 18:27

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:38

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:39

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 18:45

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 19:01

9 Name: Rabbi Ya'aqob Menashe 2013-09-04 19:12

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 19:53

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-04 22:23

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-07 17:23

13 Name: VIPPER 2013-09-22 19:57

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 20:22

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 20:48

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 21:13

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 21:40

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 22:35

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-04 22:41

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 21:19

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 21:29

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 22:19

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 23:02

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 23:03

25 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 23:07

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-07 1:47

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-07 3:15

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 0:22

29 Name: Steve 2013-10-09 0:27

33 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 6:29

34 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 7:00

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 8:27