Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

High Level Programming Languages

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-07 16:38

When is it appropriate to use a high level programming language? Personally, I always feel guilty when using anything except C.

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-08 5:06

>>79
Type safety

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-08 9:56

>>78
What exactly do the anti-C bigots suggest be used instead?
Rust

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-08 11:22

>>78
nim

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-08 23:27

>>78
Use C :)

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-09 1:37

>>84
My point exactly. C has serious flaws, but every attempt at replacing C turns out to be even worse.

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-09 9:08

>>85
Ada
Rust

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-09 11:28

>>86
My point exactly. C has serious flaws, but every attempt at replacing C turns out to be even worse.

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-09 13:30

>>87
Rust is good

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-09 15:04

>>88
Rust is written by communists.

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-09 17:38

>>89
I guess, but that doesn't change much

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-17 19:53

>>1
I'm tired of this bullshit, fuck everything you just said. C is just a bad high level programming language, calling it a low level language is just pure fucking bullshit spout by mindless UNIX retards. That 700+ pages long inconsistent standard that underdefines the bad pretense of a programming language known as C is nowhere usable for low level programming. When programming at low level, EVERY case MUST be specified, none of that "lol this is undefined behavior" traps that are so common in C and are a major source of bugs just like the completely retarded implicit integer promotion/demotion rules, you MUST have control over the machine, which absolutely does NOT mean "look at me, I can do pointers! I allocate and free memory with unsafe operations, so low level amirite?", but to be able to manipulate the stack, read and write registers and flags, and, you know, actual low level stuff. And you can have type safe, memory safe low level language, just look at typed assemblies, those are low level languages, HLAs are "syntactic sugar for assembly", not C. And don't fucking get me started with that portable assembly crap.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-17 20:22

>>91
Is there a better candidate for the title of ``low-level compiled language"?

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-17 20:45

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-17 21:34

Just write a lisp script to output your binary app.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-18 2:47

>>90
IT
CHANGES
EVERYTHING

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-19 8:35

>>91
to be able to manipulate the stack, read and write registers and flags
A lot of CPUs don't have registers. Some environments don't have stack.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-19 11:25

>>96
A lot of CPUs don't have registers.
Name one that anybody actually uses.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-19 11:37

>>97

JVM

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-20 5:43

>guilty
but check these dubs

Name: Pope of Autism 2017-07-06 8:43

>>99
Checked, now check mine.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List