Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Agile Model-Driven Development with UML 2.0

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 1:29

yah

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 14:31

We're already at UML 3.O.

Yeah. You heard me. I have ways of drawing arrows to boxes you haven't even comprehended. My development isn't driven, it's escorted by a fleet of limos.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 15:13

>>2
Are you some sort of EXPERT?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 15:29

gremlin file format FTW!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 16:59

>>2
I read your post five times! Keep posting!

Name: 14 2013-09-12 19:10

>>2
I rewrote the UML 2.0 spec when I was only 11.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 20:24

>>6
You were so young, yet you wasted your childhood like that. I bet you were born in a business suit, in the middle of some International Committee of Best Web App Scaling Practices thing.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 21:32

>>7
Do you ever wonder what that "whoosh" you keep hearing is?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 22:06

>>8
Must be the lack of scalability of my jokes!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-12 23:35

>>9
I would express amusement but every such expression has been commandeered for use as sarcasm.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-13 1:09

Has anyone here experienced the hell that is AGILE development?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-13 1:20

>>11
Only in an academic setting, I don't even want to know what real-world AGILE ``coding'' is like.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-13 1:25

>>11
It seems like every company around the world is doing scrum or some form of agile development. It's as if there is literally no other way a software team can work.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-13 1:57

>>13
Those Javascript apps aren't going to code themselves!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-13 14:44

SCRUM MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-15 2:13

WATERFALL MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-15 19:46

>>15
Sounds painful.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-16 4:39

>>17
Yes, it's a sudden radiating pain.

I'm kinda proud of that one.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-16 16:03

>>11
I've been on a team that attempted it, but it's so clearly just a layer of paperwork on top of what you're doing anyway that I can't imagine a programming department in charge of its own destiny choosing it. Either management gets sold on it, or someone on the team is trying to avoid work and pushes agile to make sure nothing ever gets done.

More recently I've been on a team that did daily meetings for a while and found that productivity ground to a halt with even that one change.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 7:48

Agile is annoying as it forces you to work in One Specific Way That Does Not Work For Everyone(TM). Just let the developers manage their time themselves. People who need Agile methodologies forced on them to get them to work efficiently shouldn't have been hired in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 11:35

>>20
Exactly. Please, allow me:
THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 10:22

Check em

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 12:47

>>11
I do, every single fucking day. I wonder why people bother with that shit. then I read that agile methodologies are somehow more freeform and less formalistic than non-agile ones and I weep for the programmers who have it even worse

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:23

I did some work at an insurance company once that used Waterfall (as misunderstood my the MBA manager) and I came to appreciate Agile.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List