/prog/ - What stirs your rage, /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-14 1:07

Mine are people who do this on C-like languages:

	if(numbers==NULL)
	{
		numbers=temp;
		numbers->next=NULL;
	}
	else
	{
		temp2=numbers;
		while(temp2!=NULL)
		{
			var=temp2;
			temp2=temp2->next;
		}
		temp2=temp;
		var->next=temp2;
		temp2->next=NULL;
	}

No spaces between operators.
Opening brace on lines by themselve.
Else statement not a continuation of the if-statement it belongs to
Terse variable.
camelCase

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 13:53

>>41
scale this
_{^{*grabs dick*}}

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:27

>>41
Stop grabbing my dick.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:52

>>42
But it's so tiny and cute!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:11

>>43
...said no girl ever.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:28

>>44
My ex-girlfriend had a small penis fetish.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:29

>>45
Lucky for you. She's a keeper.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:37

We honestly like thick and weird shaped ones. I like them limp.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:44

>>44
Yeah, no girl would ever want to touch you.

I just had sex with this cute girl who happens to have black wings and won't take off this huge red necklace of her. This is what you're missing out for programming in Javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:46

>>47
COCKLOVING FAGGOT

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:50

>>49
fuck you het boy, enjoy your disease ridden whores while I 69 with my partner who is, just like myself, an expert on penises

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 0:12

>>50
Enjoy your AIDS while I enjoy my abstinence, lusty faggot

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 0:22

>>51
I have a stable partner. Enjoy your sexual frustration, non-faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 0:37

Gentlemen,
Would you be so kind as to restrict your discussion to /lounge/?

Name: ♋ 2013-09-19 1:38

^^^^^^^^^^^

>>48
Plus, who says every /prog/rider is male. Worse yet, likes nasty vagina.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 1:38

>>53
Okay.

>>52
http://bbs.progrider.org/lounge/read/1379561762

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 1:40

>>54

Plus, who says every /prog/rider is male

Come on, this doesn't even need confirmation. There are absolutely no hopes of having real women discussing your autistic hobbies in the site you frequent daily, please never forget this.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 1:50

>>56
http://bbs.progrider.org/lounge/read/1379561762/2

Name: le pedophile sage 2013-09-19 1:51

>>56

autistic

le knowyourmeme.com face

implying autistic women dont exist
implying you cis scum normalfag /g/ros know anything
le afraid of girls face
le girlie cooties

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 7:20

Faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 9:55

>>58
You might be right but you made your point in a retarded manner. Fuck you.

>>59
Fuck you faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 10:03

>>60
Fuck you, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-22 0:14

When someone does something like
[code]if(condition) { short-statement-here; }
SHHHHEEEET.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-01 15:16

>>1
Why? Do you have any reason to hate that brace style?

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-01 18:05

int thing(int x){int t=x;while(t<10){t++;if(t==2){return -1;}else{return 1;}}return t;}

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-01 19:26

People who use singletons for EVERYTHING.
Including shit that's seriously constraining.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-03 17:35

people who argue about coding styles, language preferences and OS preference (i.e. /g/ros)

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-03 18:00

>>66
egin dubs

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-05 4:17

>>66
Programmer not coder you python using twit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-06 22:35

>>1
camelCase is nice, check your privilege

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-07 18:12

>>69
That's shitCase, not CamelCase. Check your mental retardation.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-07 20:07

>>3
do .. whiles are fucking fugly, though. Shows how much of a nigger you are.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-09 1:27

Extraneous whitespace.

Name: for >>72 2013-11-09 1:36

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-10 11:23

I HATE LINKED LISTSSSSSS SO MUCH. ESPECIALLY DOUBLY LINKED LISTS. I DONT KNOW WHY THE FUCK WOULD ANYONE WANT TO USE LINKED LISTS EVER. ALSO I HATE PEOPLE USING K&R STYLE.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 5:35

>>74
People want to dynamically allocate space for data without having to pre-allocate space for the data after the program is compiled.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 6:06

>>75
Dynamically allocating data is always a code smell. Doing it for one element at a time is just absurd.

Linked lists are always the wrong data structure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 18:36

>>76
Are you seriously suggesting to store everything in the stack?

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 19:04

>>74-76
Watch your SICP video lectures, C programmers!

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-13 5:54

>>78
I am not a C programmer, I'm an information sciencetist!

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-13 6:18

Dynamically allocating data is always a code smell

The use of the word ``always'' is usually a logic smell. Your post is not an exception to that.

What stirs your rage, /prog/?

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-14 1:07

41 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 13:53

42 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:27

43 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:52

44 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:11

45 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:28

46 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:29

47 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:37

48 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:44

49 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:46

50 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 23:50

51 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 0:12

52 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 0:22

53 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 0:37

54 Name: ♋ 2013-09-19 1:38

55 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 1:38

56 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 1:40

57 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 1:50

58 Name: le pedophile sage 2013-09-19 1:51

59 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 7:20

60 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 9:55

61 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-19 10:03

62 Name: Anonymous 2013-10-22 0:14

63 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-01 15:16

64 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-01 18:05

65 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-01 19:26

66 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-03 17:35

67 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-03 18:00

68 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-05 4:17

69 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-06 22:35

70 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-07 18:12

71 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-07 20:07

72 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-09 1:27

73 Name: for >>72 2013-11-09 1:36

74 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-10 11:23

75 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 5:35

76 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 6:06

77 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 18:36

78 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-12 19:04

79 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-13 5:54

80 Name: Anonymous 2013-11-13 6:18