/prog/ - SICP: Javascript Edition

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-14 14:08

http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~cs1101s/sicp/

Who let this happen?

Name: youtu.be/B0DE5zyRI6U 2013-09-17 20:47

>>38
He meant to say Q.E.F. I understood, I hope you do too. Also, I am loving the OST I got from & kept form XenoBlade before jewtube took them down. I hope it was not I who wrought it to jewtube by accident, when scraping them.

>>39
Is it? I am intrigued if they do employ the multicast pseudorandom stream to other nodes and non-nodes. I know several parts of I2P are not ready, which is why I have not used it much. Let look at it again, but if you can cite it for me, that would be wonderful.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 20:59

>>38
Many graph theory proofs don't even have symbols, let alone equations. But you'd know that if you weren't an ignorant little cockpustule.

>>39
I2P's design seems somewhat vulnerable to timing attacks (though certainly not more than Tor), and the implementation is execrable.

Name: ◉◉◉◉◉ 2013-09-17 21:28

>>42
But >>36 said Theorem, not Theory or Hypothesis, which is really what he is proposing (a proposition). Still with all the major ISP routers being monitored by the 5👀's, routing traffic and collection is a serious concern.

Taking a look at the following:
http://grothoff.org/christian/nss2011.pdf
https://gnunet.org/r5n
https://gnunet.org/sites/default/files/nss2011.pdf

And for the I2P thing, can they implement purpose a random delay to mitigate those type of attacks? If stuff like this that has me worried. I knew "cyber warfare" was soon, but not this soon:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/security/in-his-own-words-confessions-of-cyber-warrior-222266

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:31

>>43

5👀's

huh

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:34

>>44
You can decipher what that means by the chosen name. That reminds me, I need to save all these:
http://wrttn.me/30dbfd/
http://unicodeemoticons.com/

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:36

>>38
Are you serious? You're the pseudointellectual one if you think every proof needs equations.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:38

>>45
Those are shit for fags]. Try the superior http://www.japaneseemoticons.net/all-japanese-emoticons/

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:46

>>46
Ok, calm down, it was just language barriers, that's all. Engrish is not the best language to communicate with anyways.

>>47
I consider the fact that not everyone has access to Shift_JIS on their environments, but do have UTF-8 character maps and fonts, so I picked something more widespread and accepted. I will always have blocks in my disk for the locale

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:48

Mix systems need to be integrated with GPG or web of trust. Any ``randomly picking peers'' system can be defeated with sufficient resources.

too tired to expand on this

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 22:02

>>49
I did already mentioned that: >>13,17

We really need as many as possible to start making this a reality:
https://gnunet.org/project-overview
http://secushare.org/#help
http://about.psyc.eu/#Tasks

I am also interested on the work of cjdns, to see if this might be a better choice.

I should has openitp.org if they want to help too (looking at their small archive to see if thy are a joke or not) I wonder if the EFF saw this on their radar. I know HN and reddit did already.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 22:13

>>50

We really need as many as possible to start making this a reality

The amount of time it takes a team to complete a programming project is the time it would have taken one person to complete the project times the number of people. What will likely happen in reality is that some neckbeard a few months from now will get fucking fed up with waiting, inject emself with caffeine, and write a full mix network implementation in a week.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 23:04

>>51
Thanks for telling me to take more initiate to do the other parts…

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 23:07

>>51
Because Linux and Freebsd was built in a week⸮ At the least I know you desire to contribute is non-existant.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 7:03

>>53
No, my point is that the mix network must be a small and simple project (so that it's easy to audit, etc.). If there's twenty developers there's a good chance they'll start adding extra shit like a fucking SMTP or HTTP server (see i2p).

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 7:32

>>52,53
Also, I was only talking about the medium/high-latency mix network software project. There's many other projects that need to be written such as privacy-enhanced file sharing and email applications, and they should be protocol-agnostic (e.g. connect to arbitrary hostnames over SOCKS).

Think of it in terms of network layers:
... IP TCP mix-network application-layer

File sharing has nothing to do with an mix/anonymization network, it's just one of the many possible applications that can run over it. The only concern of a mix network is to anonymously and efficiently transfer data from node A to node B (whereas even nodes A and B don't know anything more about each other except for the destination's ``hidden service'' public key).

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 14:36

>>54
That's cause they are done, so they started extending? Zawinski's law.

>>55
How many times do I have to display this:
https://gnunet.org/compare

(whereas even nodes A and B don't know anything more about each other except for the destination's ``hidden service'' public key).

That's if the client wants/has a public key that he uses for his node. Freenet and Gnunet provide just that, even more.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 15:55

>>56
Gnunet also suffers from Zawinski's law.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 15:55

>>57

Zawinski

Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:44

>>58
As we have all noticed; the top programmers and computer scientists tend to be ethnically Jewish. Why is this?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:44

>>57
Well duh. Even the mail servers and remailers work in GNUnet. Tor did the same, now they have Mozilla in their bundle. I should get back to about.psyc.eu

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:47

>>59
Honestly, I think is how they raise their kids. The discipline style and moral upbringing, makes disciplined programmers.

But do recall, most of the Major Computer innovations were made by Americans, with no Jewish indoctrination.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:03

>>59
Because they're refined, educated and overall smart people. You think dumb people can oppress others easily? No, you have to be sly if you want to get your obedient human cattle.

I fucking love JEWS.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:07

>>62

You think dumb people can oppress others easily?

Whites somehow managed to oppress the mentally and physically superior black race in America for hundreds of years.

DIE WHITE SCUM

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:16

>>62
shalomie!

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:49

>>63
Nigger-dono, you're wrong. It's the Jews that have been oppressing you. The Crackas are innocent.

Love,
A spic.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:12

>>65
If jews are so great then how did a single austrian cracker manage to kill six million of them?

Name: Rockefeller 2013-09-18 22:24

>>66,6
Because his Pimps wanted them dead, after they got cheated out of free trade.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:51

>>66
Because he was secretly a Jew.

Name: Rothschild 2013-09-19 0:09

Hey guys! What about me!?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 2:52

where is the metacircular evaluator chapter?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 7:14

The only valid reason to use a language other than Lisp is implementing Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 13:44

>>70
not possible with javashit's }();}();}};();

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:24

Check em

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 22:19

>>72
It's ENTIRELY possible to implement a LISP REPL in Javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 22:21

>>71
Is it possible to write a usable (by modern standards) OS in LISP?

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 23:12

>>4

tm;dl Intel is finally moving to the mobile market, and need to implement everything in worserer is bestest, to win the market. They will use Javascript as the level to sabotage them all.

``The Jews'' have done that before and they will do it again and again.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 23:13

>>74
It's also possible to write an ANSI C compiler in Intercal.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 10:01

Scheme is at least half of why SICP is as good as it is, wtf

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-05-26 11:22

<script language="JavaScript">
function afterload() {
    document.options.scheme.checked = false;
    document.options.javascript.checked = true;
    window.displayManager = new DisplayManager("");
    window.displayManager.update_path();
    window.displayManager.show("contents.html");
}
</script>

:facepalm:

SICP: Javascript Edition

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-14 14:08

41 Name: youtu.be/B0DE5zyRI6U 2013-09-17 20:47

42 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 20:59

43 Name: ◉◉◉◉◉ 2013-09-17 21:28

44 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:31

45 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:34

46 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:36

47 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:38

48 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:46

49 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:48

50 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 22:02

51 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 22:13

52 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 23:04

53 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 23:07

54 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 7:03

55 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 7:32

56 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 14:36

57 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 15:55

58 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 15:55

59 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:44

60 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:44

61 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:47

62 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:03

63 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:07

64 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:16

65 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:49

66 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:12

67 Name: Rockefeller 2013-09-18 22:24

68 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:51

69 Name: Rothschild 2013-09-19 0:09

70 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 2:52

71 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 7:14

72 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 13:44

73 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:24

74 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 22:19

75 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 22:21

76 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 23:12

77 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 23:13

78 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 10:01

79 Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-05-26 11:22

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-14 14:08

Name: youtu.be/B0DE5zyRI6U 2013-09-17 20:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 20:59

Name: ◉◉◉◉◉ 2013-09-17 21:28

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:31

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:36

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:46

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 21:48

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 22:02

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 22:13

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 23:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-17 23:07

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 7:03

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 7:32

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 14:36

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 15:55

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 15:55

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:44

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:44

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 20:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:03

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:07

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:16

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 21:49

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:12

Name: Rockefeller 2013-09-18 22:24

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-18 22:51

Name: Rothschild 2013-09-19 0:09

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 2:52

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 7:14

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-29 13:44

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:24

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 22:19

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 22:21

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 23:12

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 23:13

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 10:01

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-05-26 11:22