>>8Why do you think I mentioned FreeBSD jails? Because its simple as verbal commands, and no hardware isolation required, dipshit. FreeBSD Jails are run as an application, and each jail has its own process. Fucking read manual before you spout nonsense. If there's hardware bugs, nothing can be run in the machine, not even your stupid VM Design for just that language. That's why we invented a multi level kernels, to have fail-overs measures if the hardware faults.
By mentioning COBOL, I implied a fine example in which programming languages have inherit limits on the ability to express implementations for different requirements. Implementing RSA in COBOL would be inefficient and engrossing (in all ways, time, RAM, latency, etc.).
>>5 already mentioned languages suited for nearly all general tasks, including working in a VM, and implementing one, both safe and fault tolerant.
Now, just stop posting your frustration here, just because you are forced to work as Java monkey, and hate your boss.