What's wrong with C++?

What's wrong with C++ and where does the name sepples comes from anyway? I mean apart from the sometimes fucked up syntax rules.

>>12
Actually, your second statement might not be correct.

If you meant that there exists a set of optimizations which can be done using Sepples by the programmer which cannot be done in other languages, well that's not true for a large set of other languages in the real world (any language (implementation) which gives you an escape hatch to machine code means you can make all the same optimizations, and really who is doing the optimization? you're just tricking (instead of asking) the compiler into giving you the machine code you want be restructuring your program, and that's not very clever (if you've already broken that barrier of abstraction, dont be in denial, write that part of your program in the langauge of the machine)).

If you meant there exists a set of optimization which compilers for Sepples can do but compilers for other languages cannot then I know this is empirically correct for x86 and a large set of compilers for other languages.