>>2So your complaint is that C++ is not Lisp? That's a valid complaint, but do you also extend it to C, which is often compared favorably to C++ 'round these parts, or to Java, which is often compared favorably to C++ not 'round these parts?
I have my own complaints about C++, but I would need to compose my thoughts for a good while to say anything more substantial than ``
Turing-complete templates, but no proper ABI? shite!''