Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Qt Ruby Programmer

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 14:51

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 15:18

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 15:23

Is that thing supposed to be an attractive woman?

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 16:20

There are so many things wrong with this that it some of them are starting to cancel out to me.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 16:47

>>1
Nuke it from orbit, its the only way to be sure.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 19:54

Not as annoying as I had thought she'd be so if I weren't currently in a relationship I would date her, and consider having sex after a while.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 20:14

>>6
She looked fucking stupid acting like a child and all that.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 20:36

I don't care that much about physical attractiveness; I care a lot more about what's in the mind. In the case of the person in >>1, a really shitty programming language.

She is disgusting.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:00

>>8
Well you're crazy. I don't expect females to be especially talented programmers, nor do I need them to be, but it's good to have a shared interest.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:02

>>7
*shrug*

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:03

You must be really horny or lonely if you are willing to spend the rest of your life living with a childish non-programmer just because you felt like it.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:04

>>9
Sounds like a great way to end up with someone who neither understands nor cares about what you spend 95% of your living time doing.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:12

>>11,12
Why would you want two programmers in the family? It's inefficient. You can have more if you have two separate skills. Economic specialization and all that.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:22

>>13
"Programmer" doesn't define a personality as a whole, it's merely an additional skill. Both could be programmers, for instance one being a mathematician and the other one being an economist.

Many people will go through a ton of stupid shit just to get free kisses and their dick wet, though.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:45

HA! As if being a ``talented programmer'' takes any high intelligence. No, programming is easy (this also includes the correct way of programming with lisp and C, etc). Being a COMPUTER SCIENTIST (Knuth, SICP authors, Dijkstra, etc) is what takes intelligence.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:49

>>14
people
dicks
you check your privilege right now cis scum

and i'm pretty sure that those ``people'' don't give a shit about kissing.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 21:51

>>17
Fine: get their pussies/asses filled with cock.

Though we should take this thread to /lounge/

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:24

You guys are all lame. I don't understand why someone would want to date or be partners with someone they have many things in common with.

I want to have very little in common with someone else apart from morals. I don't care about their interests. It's not important. People should have diverse interests. It's better economically, it's better socially, it's better in every way. I don't want to live in a world where everyone is the same.

You're all a bunch of queers.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:35

>>20
I already fucking said programming skills do not define a person. You can both be programmers while having diverse interests, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:37

>>26
Or, we could have even more diverse interests by her not being a programmer, except in the DSLs I have created for her to use and taught.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:38

So, in some sort of attempt to save this thread: what do you think about the intent of ``get kids to code at a young age?''

I started learning programming with BASIC at around 8 or 10, when I got access to my first computer, but I didn't do anything non-trivial until I was 15 or so (I spent lots of time doing Monte Carlo simulations of wars with randomly statted soldiers and seeing which side won, and which data-blobs were the heroes of the day). I think I turned out all right as a programmer, although I spent a lot of time learning from the wrong sorts of books until I got my first internet connection. Anyway, that's my history so you can see my biases.

There seems to be a growing idea that programming today is like reading and writing [not so] long ago: a skill that at one point was practiced only by a few, but will/should be adopted by everyone. I don't really have an opinion of this, but I do think they are going about it wrong, because every effort I've seen is devoted to getting kids to code ``webapps'' which necessarily introduces a shit-ton of infrastructure to hello, world. I guess it's because they want to attract the mainstream child audience to their lessons with the ``you can do something cool, too!'' tag-line, and writing four function calculators is ``cool'' because it's run through node.js instead of xterm/cmd.exe

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:43

>>28
Her? First you're homosexual now straight? Look buddy, you cannot have imaginary bisexual partners. Either your imaginary partner is a male or a female.

I say imaginary because YOU AREN'T EVER GOING TO GET ANY AHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAA
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH
AH AH AH HA HA HA HA HAAAAHAHAHAH

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:45

>>30
My partner is always a biological female.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-23 22:48

>>31
I didn't ask you gaylord.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 12:39

>>29
I still don't get it. The idea that we should teach every single fucking kid in the world to learn programming sounds fucking retarded. What if hipsters dominated the world instead and children were forced to take many subjects on alternative music?

One of the most commonly used arguments is that teaching kids programming is somehow a good way of finding talented programmers. If you are talented indeed, you probably liked math from the beginning and you are likely to pick up programming by yourself before the everyoneshouldcodeXD parade stomps on you. If you are not talented, you probably want to flip burgers for a living and don't want to have anything to do with that nerd shit.

Another commonly used argument is that "the software development market is in a shortage of programmers". Fucking seriously? Do you have any idea of how saturated is the market in first world countries? It's not like knowing how to program is going to get you an instajob either. You are right, they're confusing epic javashit webapps with programming. But that means they're in a shortage of code monkeys.

To sum it up, this is a retarded fad that should die already.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 14:25

>>34
As implemented, yeah, their attempts will (as a generalization) only churn out code monkeys and will do nothing for those who would pick up programming anyway. That's probably their intent, given how the movement is being spearheaded by leaders who could use more code monkeys.

The comparison to alternative music isn't quite accurate, though, because `programming' (not on career-level) is still quite useful. Not in the sense of ``can write epic webapps and enterprise-level abstraction layers!'' but in the sense of ``can write simple to moderately complex shell scripts, and can probably understand how to go about understanding various user-visible scripting systems built into programs''. That, I think, might be a useful type of message. Not everybody is going to write epic webapps, but I think everybody, at some point, will look at a task like organizing their CoD montage videos and think ``Gosh, this would be easier if only I could prepend the time of creation to all these filenames!''

The movement isn't focused on teaching that sort of thing (and you could argue it isn't `programming'), but it could be. Even despite the current efforts, the end result might be kids learning that computers aren't magic youtube boxes, that they can do lots of other things as well if you tell them how.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 14:56

Seeing the clips of her "reaction shots" or whatever was truly bizarre. I don't get it. I don't understand what makes this worth $125000 and counting.

I am kind of in favor of teaching kids to program, like I'm in favor of teaching kids math, just to benefit the ones that are able to understand it. But Ruby sure ain't the way to go about it. And children's books - I mean, we could benefit if the normies were capable of a little analytic thought, but I suspect their deficiency is neurological, not educational, in nature.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 15:53

>>36
Ruby sure ain't the way to go about it.
Agreed. Kids should learn Agda and Coq.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 16:08

I bet she has pink nipples and a pink vagina.
yum

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 16:37

Agreed. Kids should learn Agda and Coq.
Is Coq embeddable? Because I'd like to embed it in my anus.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-24 20:27

>>38
This guy has the right idea

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List