Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 21:37

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 21:43

I'm not sure why I expected anything other than discussion on sexism.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 21:53

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 21:53

why not `woman`? like man pages, but with _________ (sorry, I am not good with jokes)

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 21:57

>>4
There already is a woman in emacs, though somehow I doubt the Rubyistas who wrote this knew that.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/WoMan

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 22:06

When/why did ycombinator become flooded with ``faggots''?

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 22:11

>>6
Since Silicon Valley entrepefags started caring about social issues

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 22:23

>>4
Like man pages, but with simpler explanations.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 22:41

>>1
There appears to be an abundance of people that will type endlessly in a debate about whether or not the usage of the word 'bro' is sexist in this particular context. I wont participate in the debate, but I wonder if the data set that they continue to generate can be put to some kind of use. Maybe I could create a markov cyber-feminist bot and a cyber-anti-feminist bot. I could give them accounts for ycombinator and hackernews, make up a random headline and then have them go at it. Perhaps some real humans would join in.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 22:42

 but with examples only

Documentation without example is exactly whats wrong in todays software world, assuming this shit really is supposed to mean what it implies.

Also not gonna read that shit page.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 22:58

>>9
It would be interesting to find a method that could distinguish between pro and anti-feminist.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-25 23:34

To me, the irritating part of this is that man pages already have sections for examples (or info, if that's your thing). All the effort people are putting into writing example usage of wget would be better directed into submitting patches to wget's own documentation.

Alonzo Church on a pogo stick - why would you want to add a[nother] source of third party documentation when you can improve the documentation that caused you to be displeased in the first place?

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-26 6:06

>>9
Actually, I've been running those bots for three years now and nobody seems to have caught on.

Name: Anonymous 2014-01-26 13:49

>>9
SJW bots on tumblr would be glorious.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List