>>11That probably means EC isn't perfect, but the links posted already show it's vulnerable to a version of Shor's, so we already know that. I know I'm being foolishly optimistic, but what if that they're just saying ``Yeah, what you're using now is backdoor'd as fuck, but since we've been propping up D-Wave to build fake chips, we're pretty confident that
we have the only usable EC breakers. So go ahead and switch to EC before any more someone else finds out that RSA is vulnerable to ROT39. You'll still be no match against, us, but it will be only us.''?