>>4I was using "huge faggot" descriptively, not as an identity. Moreover, I was not referring to their sexual orientation. To rephrase and eliminate this ambiguity, "I saw a few (...), so I find that the individual whose handle is 0xabad1dea at twitter.com is a highly disagreeable fellow."
Moreover, while it is absolutely their right to identify as whatever the fuck they want and to shout it from the rooftops, it is not their right to reserve certain words such that only a person that identifies (and/or can be described) as a certain thing may use a certain word, or to force me to use any pronoun other than the standard gender-neutral "they" on them, or whatever gender-neutral pronoun I feel like using at that moment.