Rob ``Commander'' Pike - Go lang

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html
"If you need to go to somewhere, goto is the way to go".

So the new hipster shit taking over now that the ruby is full of sexist rape supportors is Go!

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html
It features a higher level of analness than seen in any programming languages that aren't based on french lambda calculi in particular:

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html

Prepare to get shamed downvoted and patronized for asking how to turn "DECLARED BUT UNUSED VARIABLE" from an error into a warning: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21743841/how-to-avoid-annoying-error-declared-and-not-used-from-golang

Here's some picks from the go implementation:

doc/go_faq.html:var _ = unused.Item // TODO: Delete before committing!
doc/go_faq.html: _ = debugData // Used only during debugging.
doc/progs/image_draw.go: _ = dirtyRect // noop
doc/progs/go1.go: _, _, _, _ = holiday1, holiday2, holiday3, holiday4
doc/progs/go1.go: _ = ErrSyntax
doc/progs/go1.go: _ = f
doc/progs/eff_unused2.go:var _ = fmt.Printf // For debugging; delete when done.
doc/progs/eff_unused2.go: _ = fd
doc/progs/error.go: _ = f


Despite this fucking ANAL BULLSHIT that even they have to work around, the language still has MOTHERFUCKING GOTO http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html

cmd/gc/walk.c comment out lines 67, 71

the follow tests will fail:

# ../test
# go run run.go -- typeswitch2.go
errorcheck typeswitch2.go : typeswitch2.go:43: missing error "declared and not used"
# go run run.go -- fixedbugs/bug373.go
errorcheck fixedbugs/bug373.go : compilation succeeded unexpectedly


You will now be able to program in peace.. unless you have to work on a codebase that has goto in it.

>>12,13
I have thought more carefully about your response since writing >>14. I am one of those people that's able to feel emotions without compromising my core being. Being ``mad'' does not carry the same consequences for me as they might for someone else. I should have chosen my words more carefully, since I haven't been genuinely ``mad'' in many years. However I can respond in a way that may cause one to think that I am angry, sad, anxious, content, or whatever emotion they wish to label their impression of their interaction with me. Perhaps that is what I meant be being mad. I may write a section of text that may give a reader the impression that I am mad. Such a reader is not aware of my emotional being since they have no access to this, only the text that I have consciously written.

However, I am a bit offended by your wish for my earlier death. That's kind of fucked up, especially considering we may have been talking about things for a few years now and we may or may not have been friends of some sort. I am not `mad', however I am `mildly perturbed'.

*clicks unfriend button*
*closes tab*