Rob ``Commander'' Pike - Go lang

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html
"If you need to go to somewhere, goto is the way to go".

So the new hipster shit taking over now that the ruby is full of sexist rape supportors is Go!

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html
It features a higher level of analness than seen in any programming languages that aren't based on french lambda calculi in particular:

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html

Prepare to get shamed downvoted and patronized for asking how to turn "DECLARED BUT UNUSED VARIABLE" from an error into a warning: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21743841/how-to-avoid-annoying-error-declared-and-not-used-from-golang

Here's some picks from the go implementation:

doc/go_faq.html:var _ = unused.Item // TODO: Delete before committing!
doc/go_faq.html: _ = debugData // Used only during debugging.
doc/progs/image_draw.go: _ = dirtyRect // noop
doc/progs/go1.go: _, _, _, _ = holiday1, holiday2, holiday3, holiday4
doc/progs/go1.go: _ = ErrSyntax
doc/progs/go1.go: _ = f
doc/progs/eff_unused2.go:var _ = fmt.Printf // For debugging; delete when done.
doc/progs/eff_unused2.go: _ = fd
doc/progs/error.go: _ = f


Despite this fucking ANAL BULLSHIT that even they have to work around, the language still has MOTHERFUCKING GOTO http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright_violations/Go_To_Considered_Harmful.html

cmd/gc/walk.c comment out lines 67, 71

the follow tests will fail:

# ../test
# go run run.go -- typeswitch2.go
errorcheck typeswitch2.go : typeswitch2.go:43: missing error "declared and not used"
# go run run.go -- fixedbugs/bug373.go
errorcheck fixedbugs/bug373.go : compilation succeeded unexpectedly


You will now be able to program in peace.. unless you have to work on a codebase that has goto in it.

>>45

my personal scheme implementation

No one cares.

What is the point of having high level languages if everyone must implement their own?

the rest being in good ol' C

Which has goto, and for your particular application you probably had a use for it! What exactly is your point?

>>46

Loop labels are the same as gotos now? This isn't what Dijkstra was talking about.

They are completely equivalent, yes. Which is useful when dealing with people who treat the title of Dijkstra's paper like a religious edict.