>>15As if you can generalize the capability of human brains. Superior brains can compare an immeasurable amount at once and then intuitively comprehend all human faces while analysing and synthesizing them. That's what superior dendritic trees can do. Dendritic trees don't possess algorithms, computers do. Dendritic trees are dendritic trees, not a computer. You cant equate brains with computer science as brains aren't computers and computation is just a sub-sub-sub-sub-aspect of the physical sub-sub-aspect of reality.
What I say is facts and what you say is nothing more than citation needed. Look at this, where is the paper for your 100k human face assertion? Nowhere to be found. Hashes are just hashes and neurons are neurons. You cant find the mind in either.
http://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&q=Dendritic+trees+100%2C000+human+faces&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8