Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

My Experience with SICP

Name: George Onsom. Shit 2014-06-06 0:11

; Alyssa P. Hacker doesn't see why if needs to be provided as a special form.
; "Why can't I just define it as an ordinary procedure in terms of cond?" she
; asks. Alyssa's friend Eva Lu Ator claims this can be done, and she defines a
; new version of if:

; (define (new-if predicate then-clause else-clause)
; (cond (predicate then-clause)
; (else else-clause)))

; Eva demonstrates the program for Alyssa:

; (new-if (= 2 3) 0 5)
; 5

; (new-if (= 1 1) 0 5)
; 0

; Delighted, Alyssa uses new-if to rewrite the square-root program:

; (define (sqrt-iter guess x)
; (new-if (good-enough? guess x)
; guess
; (sqrt-iter (improve guess x) x)))

; What happens when Alyssa attempts to use this to compute square roots?
; Explain.

What the fuck is your problem you stupid monkey? Take your fucking monkey hat
off your dumb Jewish ass and quit stressing me over fucking evaluation order
and write a fucking decent exercise for once. I wasn't happy with your
applicative-order v.s. normal-order bullshit and I'm not happy with this.

The operands that match 'then-clause' and 'else-clause' will be evaluated
before new-if is evaluated. This is because they're defined as procedures, not
syntax. How many more fucking exercise questions are you going to have that are
oriented around this same fucking concept? I get it. I'm not a stupid bitch
like Alyssa or Eva. You just need to face the facts, get this feminist bullshit
out of your head, and tell Alyssa and Eva to go back in the kitchen, and leave
programming to the men. That way you can assume that the reader has the
intelligence of the man and you might be able to write a few decent exercises
instead of elaborating on the same bullshit over and over. Note that I'm doing
you the same courtesy, as I've come to the realisation that, from sitting
around in a university all day, wearing a fucking monkey hat, your testosterone
levels have surely depleted to the level of a female, and thus you need to be
explained things like a female. Now quit wasting my time with these bullshit
exercises. Tired of this shit.

And, I repeat, take your fucking monkey hat off, you bloody circus freak.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-06 4:34

>>14
you can use a convolutional layer, which is sort of the midway point between hand-crafted feature detectors and raw inputs.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List