>>4The last I heard from SPJ was that Haskell is (he said this playfully) "useless" in the sense that it's academic and not suited for a lot industry of areas. It's still useful, the Real World Haskell movement is a good thing, especially because people are learning to adapt or create other useful programming languages to allow better correctness guarantees.
The true utility of Haskell is to show how useful certain concepts are. People have gone beyond that to make the guarantees stronger. In truth Haskell is a focal point for a certain body of knowledge. It's not bad, it's not like we'd be better off not knowing what Haskell and related languages have to say. You can write monads in nearly any language.
>>6Go? I think u mena
satirical typing.