Niggers Trying to Hack The System

Im having an extremely hard time finding a job. Got charged w/a felony 3 yrs ago and its been hell ever sense. What i want to know is can a background check be beat, cause being honest ain't workin'. I know for a fact that there is no central database of crimes that is accessible by people other than the police/FBI. ehen filling out a background check, you always have to fill in info like your name, social, bday, and address history for the past 7 years. Now, i know that they want ur address history so they can check local/state records. Do you think that if use a diff addresses it will work in them finding no information? has anyone tried this before?

illegal downloading is most definitely sinful. It is harmful to your conscious, it is harmful to the creator and copyright owner, and it violates the law of the land. In addition to the Romans 13 verse used elsewhere by other answers here, I am reminded of Jesus answer to whether we should pay taxes. He said that we should give to Cesar what is Cesar's, and to God what is God's, implying that we must respect the government and it's laws, even when those laws might not make sense to us. I believe the golden rule also plays a part here. If you were a publisher, you would want others to respect your copyright and whatever licensing terms you chose.

>>41
Go worship dead kikes somewhere else, slave.

How serious is it to allow copyright infringement? For example, today a woman was videorecording the performance of a school musical a row in front of me. Was it it seriously sinful for me not to ask her to stop her infringement?

Additionally, in the more common situation of illegal copies of music... Is it wrong to hear such music in other peoples' cars or homes/allow others to make and distribute copies of illegal music in my presences?

>>43

I've been in a similar situation, it took me a while to finally say, no thanks. Believe me it was difficult, I did get a weird look from the guy trying to giving me the burned cd but it made me feel loads better. As for watching others do it in your presence, I don't know. Usually I'll just blurt out 'Copyright Infridgement!',but it almost always comes out more comical than a warning. But if it's something big like photocopying a whole book or something, I'll nag the person until I'm decently satisfied that they'll hopefully think again. It's a shame that most peolpe don't see copyright infridgement for what it really is.

>>44

copyright infridgement

Yeah, I always keep a couple copyrights in my fridge, just in case.

>>44
It's a shame that most people don't see your naked vulnerable anus for what it really is.

>>44

But if it's something big like photocopying a whole book or something, I'll nag the person until I'm decently satisfied that they'll hopefully think again.

I agree, that's woefully damaging to the environment. Just scan the damn thing and put it up on freenet.

>>36
Whoever wrote this should go kill their worthless self.

>>34
America fuck yeah.

>>39-40,42
BURY YOUR DEAD, GOYIM

>>47
E``books'' will never overtake real physical books. E``book'' users don't actually study their e``books''

>>48
[citation needed]

>>49
Digital was cool... back in the 90s.

the Church teaches that divulging "trade secrets" is an offense against the respect for truth. Applied here, distributing or intentionally accessing the private 1's and 0's that support the livelihood or "private life" of business owners is sinful.

And lastly, it's not a bad idea to examine the practices of the moral authorities themselves. On the US Conference of Catholic Bishops' website, near the bottom of every page is a copyright notice:

© 2013 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (usccb.org)

>>50
That's good, because I refuse to be ``cool''.

http://mv.vatican.va/3_EN/pages/z-Info/MV_Copyright.html
The contents of this site are protected by copyright. Neither the text nor the images may be reproduced, in any form, without the authorisation of the Vatican Museums, 00120 Vatican City.

http://www.digitalislam.eu/article.do?articleId=2729
Copying and counterfeiting are not perceived as legal wrongs, but as a means of extracting revenge from the West's relentless commercial conquest. The best evidence of this is that whereas the copying of Western products occurs all the time, local products are respected[104]. The United States Trade Representative Special 301 report[105] listed many Middle Eastern countries on their priority watch list for intellectual property infringement. In fact pirated compact discs and windows software versions are widely available on Middle Eastern markets. Western books are being translated and resold regardless of copyright issues and television programs continue to be rebroadcasted without permission. Not to mention the widespread phenomenon of counterfeiting of luxury goods, vehicle spare parts and pharmaceutical products. On the other side it appears that there is an underlying policy of fundamental respect for works and ideas of other Middle Easterners. Local software is not being copied, but this might be motivated by the quality - but what is more interesting is that gold merchants appear to respect the integrity of local jewellery designs and not copy them[106].

>>55
Revenge by widespread ``stealing'' western propaganda seems like an odd idea to me.

Disputes over the copyrights of pastors' sermons aren't likely to go away, said Frank Sommerville, a Dallas-based attorney who specializes in nonprofit law. That's partly because of the money at stake, and partly because current copyright law is stacked against pastors.

Sommerville says that under the Copyright Act of 1976, a pastor's sermons qualify as "work for hire." That means the copyrights and intellectual property rights actually belong to their employer.

"It's not the answer that pastors expect," said Sommerville. "They've always taken the position that God gave them the sermon as part of their ministry. It never crossed their minds that there would be a law that would govern their sermons."

>>56

Iranians copy a lot of math and physics books. And when they legally purchased hardware+software solution from Siemens, America forced Siemens backdoor it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet

http://it-beta.slashdot.org/story/11/08/04/1520239/dos-backdoor-and-easter-egg-found-in-siemens-s7

>>58
*irony*

>>58
So their tablescrapes were poisoned. That's hardly surprising. Too bad they couldn't make it themselves.

Notch is a greedy hypocritical kike...

https://www.etsy.com/teams/7722/discussions/discuss/12627390/

The Use of the word "MineCraft" in my tile &/or description is consider copyright infringement. I removed the listing etsy pointed out & didn’t repost. These items had logo from the company so i removed them. Now the same company says that all my listings that use the word "Minecraft" must be removed.

http://www.androidcentral.com/minecraft-creator-sued-patent-infringement-android-game

It amazes me that people complain about paying a royalty for a technology that stops up to a third of a software companies sales from being lost to piracy. What are you saying? "Its all right to steal from Uniloc as long as it helps stop pirates stealing from me? ... I had to spend $40,000 back in 1992 to protect my idea. It was not frivolous for me... it was the difference between having a deposit for a house and having a patent.

OP, if you are still here, and you got caught in copyright, you need a lot to learn on how NOT to get caught.

Anyways, just get any job you can since you are unemployed, and lie the fuck out of your forms. Honesty never helped anyone. Once you get the job and maintain it for 6 months, then you can start being loyal-ish, i.e. fake open/honest.

Seriously, why do you think there's a section for:

If you lived with a different name, tell us which, and where:

Just think for awhile: what does an employer really look for?
Heck, go to one of those unemployment centers and go to a seminar on how to earn a job. You will see EVERYONE LIES, even your boss. The worst part is:

It's too expensive to do a BG check, so we won't since this candidate looks goldenm; even his performance tests excelled.

For the drug test, ask for an alternative, since "You are on medication, and for religious reasons you do not want your unholy piss to be soiled" Background checks are done this way now. Pissy, right?

For freelance, get every client you can, and start building a portfolio under that company name. Compete, even if you have to ask for 6$/hr. The winners are the ones that get the clients. It's a rough business, and never hesitate price haggle with clients. They love that too.

Once your portfolio is solid, and you have a good set of templates and libraries, then you can increase your rates. But always place the "Willing to negotiate rate" banner.

>>63
woah there ted bundy, kill yourself.

>>63

It's too expensive to do a BG check, so we won't since this candidate looks goldenm; even his performance tests excelled.

Actually, it isn't more expensive than a Google lookup, because crime records are open. There is also your Facebook, where you posted something liek "SHIT! Got sued by Zuckerberg because denied lel holohoax"

>>65
Not if you lie, which is the point. The majority of companies don't even bother with one if the resume, application, and exam passed. It's also why there's that ~2week training window, to test the candidacy of screened.

Am just exaggerating the reason why they don't bother to do it, even when they should.

But no one here uses SNs, right? This includes Linkedin

>>66

But no one here uses SNs, right?

SN as Social networks?
Does this include stackoverflow, hackernews, slashdot, github and bitbucket?

>>67
Yes,
stackoverflow: If you are not an attention faggot
hackernews: Same ^
slashdot: YEP
githup: Most certainly. Alt: https://about.gitlab.com/
bitbucket: ^

Plus, you all use aliases, as to separate identities, right? Including email addresses

>>68
I had made two facehub accounts because of some niggers but I do not use them nor I am going to

>>65

, because crime records are open.

What kind of a shitty country permits this travesty? And why the fuck are employers allowed to check criminal records for jobs where they don't matter?

>>66

The majority of companies don't even bother with one if the resume, application, and exam passed

Actually they do bother and care, because as a programmer you sign NDA and work with sensitive information, like credit card numbers. In some cases a screw-up (like a backdoor or a kill-switch) may easily cost your employer millions. The worst part is that most programming jobs involve trade secrets.

And things like using pirated software show that you do not respect the law and can break NDA or do spying anytime.

>>70
Your babysitter raped a child 25 years ago and was jailed until now, shouldn't you have the right to check?
Don't make a crime if you don't want others to see

America has one of the highest jail rates in the world, hence crime record checks of Americans are pretty much useless. The employer knows that you probably did some time in prison, so why bother checking exactly what crime you've committed? Americans are untrustworthy crooks, that's an axiom.

>>73
American here, never been arrested.

>>72
Which part of "jobs where they don't matter" didn't you understand?

Don't make a crime if you don't want others to see

Don't do what the king doesn't like if you don't want to be tortured to death

>>74
Then you must be a white, male, and conservative. Pleased to fuck you in the ass.

>>75

Which part of "jobs where they don't matter" didn't you understand?

Okay, let me make a new example, a nigger killed someone and stole stuff. I believe I have the right not to hire him.
Why should I hire any criminal in the first place?
I will just look at his crimes and if he did something I did not like then no job for him

Don't do what the king doesn't like if you don't want to be tortured to death

We live in a world with laws, some laws are bad and some are not. Do not forget that this thing is a law itself

Then you must be a white, male, and conservative. Pleased to fuck you in the ass.

This is highly racist

>>76
It's not racist if it's against whites!

>>76

Okay, let me make a new example, a [racist term for black person] killed someone and stole stuff. I believe I have the right not to hire him.

Unless you're about to entrust that individual with your company's finance, what ey's done in the past is as irrelevant as eir skin colour.

Why should I hire any criminal in the first place?

Because if all employers think that way, nobody will hire em, therefore ey'll be forced to go back to a life of crime, and maybe you'll be the next person they mug and kill.

We live in a world with laws, some laws are bad and some are not. Do not forget that this thing is a law itself

Yes, and allowing employers to discriminate upon criminal record when it is irrelevant is bad law.

This is highly racist

Cry me some delicious white tears.

>>78
Who decides what is or is not irrelevant to the job, if not the employer, you racist?

>>72

Don't make a crime if you don't want others to see

Then you should stop downloading illegal music. Also, most of youtube videos infringe copyright. Even those mario let's plays and speedruns:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let%27s_Play_%28video_gaming%29#Legal_issues