LET'S HAVE A LAUGH AT NIKITA SADKOV

https://github.com/saniv/text/blob/master/criticism/c.txt

while 32-bit integers are inefficient on 16-bit platform, changing int to 16 bit would break portability

DAT'S Y U USE long WHEN U NEED DA RANGE OF A 32-BIT INTEGER, YA FUCKIN RETOID. USE short TO CONSERVE MEMORY. USE int AS A 'COMFORTABLE' TYPE WITH DA RANGE OF A 16 BIT INTEGER.

C implicitly converts between floats and integers, despite they being completely different and incompatible objects,

IT CONVERTS DEM IF U ASK DA LANGUAGE TO CONVERT DEM. WAT'S DA FUCKIN PROBLEM? WUD U PREFER IT IF IT WEREN'T POSSIBLE TO CONVERT BETWEEN FLOATS AND INTEGERS?

Moreover, C allows passing integer, where pointer is expected, leading to segmentation faults.

DAT'S A CONSTRAINT VIOLATION UNLESS U USE A FUCKIN CAST. WAT DA FUCK ARE U TALKIN ABOUT YA DELUSIONAL NUT? YAINT RED DA FUCKIN STANDARD.

While malloc always stores the size of allocated array

A GOOD malloc IMPLEMENTATION USUALLY WILL. SAYIN DAT IT "ALWAYS" STORES DA SIZE IS BULLSHIT. IT CUD "ALWAYS" RETURN A NULL POINTER FOR ALL DA STANDARD CARES. DER'S A VALID CRITICISM OF DA STANDARD FOR U.

Despite being called "portable assembler"

ONLY RETOIDS FROM MOSCOW CALL IT DAT. IT'S A HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE.

C preprocessor #include system relies on a myriad of unobvious hacks, like "#ifndef COMMON_H", "#pragma once"

DATS ONLY COS U RETOIDS KEEP INCLUDING HEADER FILES INSIDE OF HEADER FILES. U EAT WHERE U SHIT. DA LANGUAGE SURE AIN'T EASY TO USE, BUT UR COMMENTING ON POOR PROGRAMMING PRACTICE, JUNIOR. IF U STICK ONE OF DESE HEADER-GUARDING RETOIDS IN FRONT OF ANY PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE, DEY'RE GONNA WRITE GARBAGE. NO FUCKIN QUESTION ABOUT IT.

SOMEONE EXPLAIN C TO DIS RETOID BEFORE HE SPOUTS MORE CRAP ABOUT DA "ABI" N OTHER BULLSHIT. IF YA CAN'T FIND A STATIC STANDARD LIBRARY DAT AIN'T DA FAULT OF DA FUCKIN LANGUAGE, AND YAINT LOOKIN HARD ENOUGH.

DIS IS EVEN FUNNIER THO. IF U THOUGHT IT WAS FUNNY HOW HE WAS RAMBLING ABOUT SHIT HIS COMPILER DOES WEN HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE TALKIN ABOUT C, U'LL LOVE DIS EVEN MORE. HE PRETENDS HE'S TALKIN ABOUT UNIX BUT HE TALKS ABOUT CRAP LIKE NAUTILUS AND GNOME (HAVE U RETOIDS EVEN USED DOSE FUCKIN PROGRAMS? I AINT):
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saniv/text/master/criticism/unix.txt

HERE'S DA FUNNIEST PART THO, HE USES A SOFTWARE LICENSE FOR ALL HIS BABBLING: https://github.com/saniv/text/blob/master/LICENSE

GOOD JOB, PROFESSOR! IM SURE UR SOFTWARE WILL RECEIVE MANY USERS! HAHA

N HERE'S HIS LATEST DIARY ENTRY:
https://github.com/saniv/text/blob/master/notes/how-to-win-any-argument.txt

U CAN KEEP TELLING URSELF REALITY'S SUBJECTIVE, BUT DAT'S ONLY COS U'VE BEEN AROUND SYMBOLS TOO LONG AND U'VE FORGOTTEN WAT REAL LIFE IS LIKE. SYMBOLS AND THOUGHT CHANGE EASY, BUT UR SKINNY ASS DOESNT. U CAN CHANGE DA MEANING OF 'NIKITA', '100KG', '=', 'UNDER', AND 'PANCAKE' ALL U WANT, BUT U KNO DAM WELL DAT: NIKITA UNDER 100KG = PANCAKE. DAT'S OBJECTIVITY FOR U.

>>11
ON SECOND THOUGHT, DOSE LAST TWO EXAMPLES WUD ALL PRODUCE NULL POINTERS CONSIDERING DAT (int) 0 FITS DA DESCRIPTION FOR A NULL POINTER CONSTANT. 2 BE EXACT:

int x = 0;
void *p = x; /* CONSTRAINT VIOLATION */
void *q = (void *) x; /* STORES AN IMPLEMENTATION-DEFINED VALUE IN p */