Re: Have you read SICP

Why should I believe you, or follow a link from someone in their first 10 posts? Why is that book worth reading? What does SICP stand for?

Hmm, at least the link seems to be honest (pointing where it appears to point).

Thanks.

>>19
Can't bullshit me, Lispie boy. Lisp does not have this feature, it only allows manipulation of imperative statements via macros which are type-unsafe. So in Lisp it is possible to e.g. mix I/O actions together with STM actions and the code will compile. Haskell 1, Lisp 0.