Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Is Haskell better than Scheme?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 13:03

The Sussman said:

Haskell is the most advanced of the obsolete languages. But don't take it wrong, they're all obsolete!

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 16:35

Is Haskell better than Scheme?
GHC includes some compiler optimizations for lazy evaluation, which are missing in Scheme compilers.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 18:35

They are different. Apples and oranges.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 18:56

>>3
They can still be compared
Apples are much better because oranges fuck up my tummy with all of that ACID they have in, fucking shit

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 18:59

What is he implying here? What are obsolete languages? What transcended them?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 19:02

Google OP's quote and found this
http://twitter.com/bos31337/status/115840467521908738

>>5
this.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 19:07

>>4
I like the acid, pal. And the peel can be used as an ingredient.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 21:43

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-15 22:12

Sussman hates almost all computer languages, including those he invented. Why? "They're full of expressions."

Expressions have anonymous connections; expressions are trees accumulations, they collect at just one output.

He wants to see the connections, what's there. Propagators make all connections explicit.

Hasn't come up with a good language for this yet, lambda calculus is the starting glue for now.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-16 0:47

propagate my anus

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-16 12:39

no mutability
Haskell is shittier than even Scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-16 14:05

>>11

Yeah. They should realize, that removing a feature doesn't automatically make something better.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-16 20:13

>>11,12
u mad c and lisp are still the best languages

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-16 21:29

>>13
c is slow and lisp is bloated;;-

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-16 21:30

>>14
le troll master lulz ;D

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-17 7:02

C is useless because error-prone and weak/unexpressive.
Lithp is useless because shit type system, parenthesitis and error-prone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-17 7:14

>>16
error-prone
type system
Stop being a low iq mongrel who can't program for shit. You don't see people of other intellectual fields try to come up with shit to make retards survive and fuck over people who aren't stupid. I don't make errors, motherfucker.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-17 8:51

>>17
I'm glad you're not a civil engineer.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-17 9:08

>>17
You've just made the error of too trolling too fat.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-17 9:36

>>17
shit to make retards survive and fuck over people who aren't stupid
It is exactly languages with no in-built compiler safety (like Scheme and PHP) that allow retards to survive and proliferate their shitty, bug-ridden code. The compiler is the only thing that can guarantee that the monkey who typed the code couldn't have made at least a certain set of errors.

But then again, Haskell doesn't have safety either, as it allows any retard to unsafePerformIO.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-17 10:35

I wish people would learn English.

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-11 5:36

(stopping the dubsfaggot from dubsbumping)

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List