Awful web development framework
1
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-01 5:41
2
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-01 6:23
3
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-01 10:05
4
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-01 10:19
Just use Node.js! JavaScript is literally LISP with better syntax.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-01 20:40
It's still better than Perl.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-01 20:58
I love web frameworks for languages not intended to be used for web development, to be honest.
7
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-01 22:16
>>1 It doesn't look that bad actually...
>>5 Both Mojolicious and Dancer are much better than any other lispshit web framework
8
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-02 0:21
>>7 The routing capabilities are a little bare-bones for my liking, but they're also so flexible that I have very little to complain about.
9
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-02 1:00
If only HTML, CSS, JS, HTTP, AJAX and virtually every single fucking web ``technology'' weren't such a honking piece of shit
10
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-02 1:21
>>9 /prog/ thinks
everything is shit.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-02 1:24
>>10 That's because almost everything is shit.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-02 1:39
13
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-02 2:44
I left you folks a present in the fossil repo.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 4:42
leave a present in my anus.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 5:41
>>11 That's because the real world is inherently messy and not neat. There is no perfection and Unix is certainly not perfection.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 5:43
When there is no effort to make it better, perfection is being better than all current alternatives.
17
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-03 5:46
18
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 9:03
The goal in programming is to write a program. All the layers of rubbish (operating system, non-uniform hardware interfaces, etc.) make that unnecessarily complex.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 9:38
>>18 It pisses me off how much shit you have to wade through to do simple things.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 10:10
>>18,19 Do you mean you actually want to write hardware drivers for every single app you want to write? Operating systems exist so that app writers don't needlessly rewrite basic OS functions. Now for a general purpose OS, the general app writer is going to demaand a certain base of functions. These layers of abstraction are nothing compared to the work you'd have to do if you were writing basic OS functions for every app that you write.
21
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-03 12:59
>>20 The OS is there to provide you with system calls, not a bunch of giant libraries.
22
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-03 14:36
>>20 every single app argument disregarded
23
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-03 15:19
>>21 I would make the argument the kernel is there to provide the system calls. The OS is really the user space that utilizes the kernel.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-05 6:11
>>20 This isn't always true. A poorly designed interface often introduces its own complexity and restricts your access to what you want.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-05 23:37
>>23 I would argue that it is there to provide
PASCAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
27
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-16 6:51
this isn't an absolute rule or anything, b-baka
28
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-20 16:33
My puppy has no ears.!
29
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-21 22:36
>>28 No no no no no.
It's my cat has no eyes.
How does she hear? Terrific
!
30
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-28 21:28
>>26 What's the matter with you, man?
31
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-29 7:02
32
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-29 16:26
33
Name:
Anonymous
2014-12-29 17:05
My chicken has no butt
34
Name:
Anonymous 2014-12-29 17:12
>>33 I respect you for your sweet dubs, but not for your joke.
Newer Posts