Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

"A gentle introduction to Symta" - Nikita Sadkov

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 0:46

"Advanced Symta" - Nikita Sadkov

Where are these books?!

Nikita, write and publish!

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-12 9:59

>>40
I'm not telling which one I wrote, but its one of the ones that passes thunks as the x arguments and captures local references when constructing B. That's all you need to be able to do to solve the problem anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 8:30

>>41
passes thunks
Basically Algol emulation.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 8:54

>>42
if anyone wrote algol today we would call them thunks in algol too

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 11:13

>>43
You don't call them thunks in Algol, the same way you don't call everything "a thing", because every Algol's expression is a thunk.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 14:03

>>44
so you agree it's not incorrect even if it is redundant

saying "emulating algol" of other languages almost always is

Local variables of routines are often kept in activation records (also call frames). In many languages, these records are kept on a call stack.

the need to emulate algol only exists in languages that don't use frames natively, and you'll see an environment pointer being passed around

virtually none of the implementations on that page take that option

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 20:56

kanoot

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 21:00

Algol is an ancient shitty language, thunks weren't even invented then.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 21:36

>>47
yes they were, without them algol can't pass the man or boy test

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 21:59

>>47
Think of Algol as of Haskell predecessor - a completely useless experimental language, used to write academic papers about impractical concepts.

Back then Algol was simplified to CPL, which was simplified to BCPL, then B, which itself ended up as C.

All because efficient Algol compiler is impossible, due to unusual evaluation strategy, and the compiler itself was enormously complex. They had to implement intermediate languages, like CPL, to implement the slow 1 byte per second Algol compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 22:05

>>49
Cool. Didn't know that.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 22:07

>>50
That's because I totally made it up.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-13 22:11

>>51
Even better.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-14 8:51

>>51
Which part of it was made up?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-14 17:23

Don't miss this, Nikita:

http://ruhaskell.org/

It's the Russian community of Haskell users. We know you love Haskell. You'll fit right in there and find many new friends.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-14 21:46

Fun fact: official Russian translation of the Gentle Introduction to Haskell is called «Мягкое введение в хаскелл», which has VERY clear sexual connotations (literally: soft insertion into Haskell)

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-14 23:08

>>55
Copro duct.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-14 23:56

>>55
I pull my Haskell out of your ass.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-15 0:06

>>57
No surprise the language is covered in shit.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-15 0:27

>>58
It's pure.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-15 1:56

pure shit.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-15 1:59

anus :: ().() -> Shit

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-15 2:48

>>60
How many 9s we talkin here?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 10:08

>>54
Sorry, guy. I'm not gay. I have a girlfriend and she is Jewish.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 13:14

>>63
You know that all your possible children from her will be Jewish, right, Nikita?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 13:25

>>64

With JEWS you lose

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 15:37

I stole these dubs from >>67

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 18:11

>>66
Rude.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 18:26

>>66
Please give them back.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 21:12

>>63
and she is Jewish.
I fucking knew it! I knew it would happen!

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-17 22:53

Where are the books, Mr. Nikita?
Where is the man or boy test?
Don't let us with the hard penis in the hand without being able to masturbate!

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-18 0:11

>>70
Forget about it, for he hath a girlfriend now.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-18 8:53

>>36
I did sleep with a woman, but maybe a boy would be better.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List