programming languages

Im looking for a programming language, it cant be Sepples (thats is pig disgusting++) or any form of C. It has to be multi-threading capable out of the box(without any external libraries or imports) and has be be open-source. And has to be really fast (to run and to compile). Also It must have generic programming support with operator/function overloading. And you have to post projects done in it first (i want to make sure it's syntax is sane). And it would be nice if it came with multiplatform optimizing compiler (WITH windows 64-bit support). OH! and it CANNOT have any garbage collection, or forced reference counting schemes. It has to be made of stable APIs, or something that doesn't require changing my code when i update the compiler. Also it would be nice if it was LLVM-based and not some arcane backend like "it compiles to C then uses platform C compiler". I have found some new languages that claim to be as fast as C,as safe as Java and as easy as python, but it was just a marketing trick, and i don't want to waste my time to check such lies and get disappointed again.

>>40
A few educational books and a blog post from 2001 is not the same as the haskell faggots blogging on reddit about haskell jobs and how it will completely change the modern face of software engineering.

>>41
That's because LITHP has no new jobs and will not be able to change anything. The only thing they can do to proselytize LITHP is to give introductions to it. They don't brag about LITHP simply because there's nothing to brag about! (Graham tried to brag but obviously couldn't convince anybody)

>>42
There is no reason to brag about anything once you've found peace. With lisp you achieve satori. With satori, there is no more need for anything. The world adopting lisp is insignificant compared to satori.

>>43
Then why are they trying to popularize LITHP?

>>44
To spread wisdom. The only people that push lisp in the business world are clojurists, which are just as bad as haskellers.

http://landoflisp.com/ has a fun comic on the front page.

>>45
But Clojure is not a Lisp.

>>46
Exactly.

>>46
But Clojure is a Lisp.

>>48
No, it isn't.

>>49
Yes, it is.

>>50
Thanks for bumping this thread, I wouldn't have wanted to miss your contribution.

>>51
You're welcome.