A.I.

Why is it that we don't see any groundbreaking development on the field of A.I., but people continue saying we should be scared and whatnot? And it's not the usual crackpots, it's actually people who supposedly know better. I'm confused.

http://www.bbc.com/news/31047780
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/dec/02/stephen-hawking-intel-communication-system-astrophysicist-software-predictive-text-type
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/27/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat

>>30
But I'm not black, so your analogy doesn't hold.

See, Jews couldn't convince other Jews that racism is bad even if they tried to. The very existence of Jewry relies on centuries of careful, disciplined, practical racism. It is only the Goyim that they're selling the "racism is vewy vewy bad, mister" medicine to.

To make your analogy correct, whites would have to preach against racism only to blacks. "We whites put you down and that's OK, although you blacks should never be racist because racism is eval!!!" But instead, the whites actually pussied out and fell for the anti-racism propaganda, embracing the racial intermixing that will doom the white race. The whites lost the ideological race and forgot that racism is the right thing to do.