A.I.

Why is it that we don't see any groundbreaking development on the field of A.I., but people continue saying we should be scared and whatnot? And it's not the usual crackpots, it's actually people who supposedly know better. I'm confused.

http://www.bbc.com/news/31047780
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/dec/02/stephen-hawking-intel-communication-system-astrophysicist-software-predictive-text-type
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/27/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat

>>33

Atheism is a Jewish invention.

Atheism is false.

Humans are self-improving intelligent agents(do you expect to be taken seriously?)

Humans are constrained by their biology, and natural evolution is blind. Self-improving AGIs would be free of such constraints.

Machines can never be anything more than machines.

A machine is merely the extension of an intelligent agent's will. Most of humanity in the Western world, and the developing world for that matter, are programmed from birth to be good goyim. In that sense, they are merely extensions of the Jewish people as a whole.

It's only on the fringes of society, in places such as /prague/, where you find intelligent agents who have freed themselves from the shackles of Jewish enslavement, who have repossessed their "souls" so to speak, and who are no longer mere machines but masters of them.