A.I.

Why is it that we don't see any groundbreaking development on the field of A.I., but people continue saying we should be scared and whatnot? And it's not the usual crackpots, it's actually people who supposedly know better. I'm confused.

http://www.bbc.com/news/31047780
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/dec/02/stephen-hawking-intel-communication-system-astrophysicist-software-predictive-text-type
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/27/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat

>>57,59
Do you think Lord Rothschild and his fellow Kabbalists think atheism is false? Of course not, atheism is for the goyim, and any Jew who falls prey to the ideology of atheism is merely a beneficial sacrifice for the cause.

Rothschild and Co. borrowed most of the ideas from Corpus Hermeticum back when the Medicis rediscovered it along with the works of Plato. It was only because of the meddling affairs of the Catholic Church in trying to reframe Hermeticism within Christianity that the Jew thought Judaism had anything to do with Hermeticism, and so the two got mixed up and became Kabbalism.

But real Hermeticism lived on. Were Hermeticists such as Newton and Leibniz atheists? What about George Boole, was he certain Atheism was the correct path? What about Kurt Gödel?

Why did the Jews within Freemasonry act to suppress the Leibniz's discoveries (he had figured out boolean logic, predicate calculus, lambda calculus, and had built a mechanical computer) and claim them for themselves--only for George Boole to rediscover them independently a century later?

To say we should accept atheism while keeping Hermetic knowledge for yourselves behind our backs is no different than telling us racism is bad while practicing racism yourselves.