/prog/ - Code Readability Experiment

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:05

Please rate on a scale of 1 to 10 how readable you find this example of C code. If feedback is good enough, we may force a certain major open source project to adopt it.

/**************** Includes *****************/
/***/ /*---*/ #include <stdio.h> /*--*/ /***/
/*************** End Includes **************/
/************** Main Function **************/
/*------------ Main Declaration -----------*/
/***/ /*----------*/ int /*----------*/ /***/
/***/ /*----------*/ main /*---------*/ /***/
/***/ /**/ (int argc, char** argv) /**/ /***/
/*---------- End Main Declaration ---------*/
/*---------------  Main Body --------------*/
/***/ /*************/ { /*************/ /***/
/***/ /**/  long a = 0, b = 1; for /**/ /***/
/***/ /**/ (int i = 0; i < 1<<8; i /**/ /***/
/***/ /**/ ++){printf("%lu, ", a = /**/ /***/
/***/ /****/ b + a); b = a - b;} /****/ /***/
/***/ /*********/ return 0; /*********/ /***/
/***/ /*************/ } /*************/ /***/
/*-------------- End Main Body ------------*/
/************* End Main Function ***********/

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:15

Horrifying.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:16

joy divison?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:25

How can you say that you love her if you won't even eat her shit?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:54

>>1
Excellent Enterprise Quality Standard
1.Fully commentable(every line has comment space)
2.Equal length and centered for visually impared
3.Quality, informative Enterprise-grade Descriptive Labels for "Main Function" inherent borders and limits.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 10:06

it's pretty.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 13:13

Beautiful. I really felt like a strong black woman reading this code.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 17:45

Eleven

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 23:05

>>4
How can you say that you love her if you won't even read her code?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 2:17

10/10

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 2:19

>>10
A 1 then? I see. Can you explain why you hate it so much?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 2:59

>>11
It's a very low syntax-semantics density. Even Lisp with its never ending maze of parenthesis have a higher code density than this.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 3:14

Oh look, it's another fibs program. How entralling.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 4:37

>>12> look at me I sound smart lol> oh lisp lol too hard too much parens lol

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 5:36

>>1
it's hard to modify without putting a lot of effort into re-formatting it. not really worth it

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 6:16

How do you deal with long lines?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 12:28

>>12
One parenthesis cannot form a maze, idiot. Perhaps you meant: "never ending maze of parentheses"?

Name: { 2015-02-08 14:50

I'm lost in a labyrinth of one curly brace here, guys. It's lonely.

Name: } 2015-02-09 5:44

>>18

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-09 6:00

Ahhhh! Now >>18-kun is trapped!

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-09 6:45

>>20
negative, >>18-kun's scope has ended and he has been finalized.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-09 7:52

>>21
No! He hasn't finalized yet! Another continuation will retrieve him!

Code Readability Experiment

1 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:05

2 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:15

3 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:16

4 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:25

5 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 6:54

6 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 10:06

7 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 13:13

8 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 17:45

9 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-07 23:05

10 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 2:17

11 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 2:19

12 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 2:59

13 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 3:14

14 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 4:37

15 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 5:36

16 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 6:16

17 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-08 12:28

18 Name: { 2015-02-08 14:50

19 Name: } 2015-02-09 5:44

20 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-09 6:00

21 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-09 6:45

22 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-09 7:52